.
Feedback

Rent Out of Reach for 57% of Renting Population

A minimum-wage worker would need to work 173 hours per week to afford a typical one-bedroom apartment in San Mateo County.

As one Patch blogger expressed recently, San Mateo County remains one of the nation's least affordable rental markets.

Now, new data from "Out of Reach," a nationwide study that determines how much money a household must earn to afford to rent a modest home, is echoing that blogger's sentiment with facts and figures.

Compiled by the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the data in "Out of Reach" reports that a San Mateo County worker would need to earn $34.52 an hour, or nearly $72,000 annually, to afford the rent for a typical two-bedroom apartment in the County, putting it out of reach for 57 percent of the renting population.

"This report comes on the heels of similar data recently released by the County of San Mateo citing the average [local] rent for a one-bedroom apartment as $1,925 a month, putting it out of reach for most teachers, home health aids, bank tellers, and so many others," said Kate Comfort Harr, executive director of HIP (Human Investment Project) Housing.

"Even more alarming — a hard-working minimum wage earner would have to work 173 hours per week to afford this rent," she added. "There literally are not enough hours in the week for them."

According to HIP Housing, the San Mateo County rental situation has been exacerbated by the extremely low inventory of affordable housing units and the loss of Redevelopment Agencies (RDAs) statewide, which had previously been one of the largest funders of affordable housing construction in the county.

HIP Housing's Home Sharing Program provides assistance for those in San Mateo County with few affordable housing options. The program matches those who have space in their home with those who need an affordable place to live.

With average rents around $700, the program creates a win-win for both home providers and home seekers. Providers gain additional income, companionship and help with household chores, while seekers avoid homelessness and are able to remain in the community where they work and often grew up.

By utilizing existing housing stock in this way, the program provides an innovative solution to creating new affordable housing opportunities in San Mateo County, said Clarice Veloso, HIP Housing's development director.

"In the last six months, we have seen an 11-percent increase in calls from those in need of an affordable place to live, and a 30-percent increase from those at risk of homelessness," said Harr. "For every one home provider, there are currently six seekers - one of the highest ratios we've ever seen in our program."

"The program makes good common sense, and with our 40-year history, we have a lot of expertise," Harr continued.

Lucille Camuso, a HIP Housing home provider, explained, "I lost my job two years ago, and my unemployment ran out a year-and-a-half later. I was starting to have difficulty making my mortgage payments when I decided to come to HIP Housing for help," said Camuso. "HIP Housing matched me with my housemate, Michel, who himself was going through a tough time after he had lost his home to a short sale."

"Having the extra income has reduced both of our financial stress," Camuso added. "Home sharing is helping us through these hard times."

What do you think of the current state of the rental housing in and around Redwood City/Woodside? What do you think potential solutions could be? Tell us in the comments below.

Keep up with local news — follow Patch!

 

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

 

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.