.
Feedback

Pacifica Likely to Take Control of HMB Coastside Public Access Station

Vote to replace longstanding provider MCTV will take place at Tuesday's County Board of Supervisors and Half Moon Bay City Council meeting.

Since 1995, the public access television station in Half Moon Bay (Channel 27 on Comcast) and the unincorporated San Mateo County Coastside has been operated by Mid-Coast Television (MCTV). Based in El Granada, MCTV is led by President and Station Manager Constance Malach.

Now, after over 15 years, the city and county will likely be awarding the contract to Pacifica Community Television, the station which runs the public access station for Half Moon Bay's neighbor to the north.

Tomorrow morning, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors will vote on awarding a contract to Pacifica Community Television for public, education, and governmental (PEG) access television services for the unincorporated San Mateo County Coastside (Montara, Moss Beach, El Granada, Princeton, Pescadero and La Honda). The same evening of June 7, the Half Moon Bay City Council  will vote on commencing a contract with Pacifica Community Television for PEG services. While the contract with the county will begin on June 7, 2011, the city's will begin on September 12. Both will sunset on June 30, 2015, with the option to extend the contract for up to five years.

The station will be paid $15,000 in startup fees for live equipment broadcasting from both the city and county ($7,500 each). Its yearly compensation will be approximately $73,000 (Half Moon Bay will pay $35,000 per year and San Mateo County will pay $38,000 per year).

MCTV and San Carlos-based Peninsula Television (PenTV), which broadcasts in 12 Peninsula cities, also applied for the contract. After notification of the city and county's recommendation, MCTV filed a letter of protest in February. The letter was denied after review. Though PenTV did not file an official protest letter, the station  sent a letter in April asking for their proposal to be reconsidered. (For copies of these letters, along with the letter from the county that denied MCTV's protest letter, view PDF attachments in the media box to the right).

In addition to broadcasting live meetings and study sessions of the Half Moon Bay City Council, Pacifica Community Television will be required by contract to do the following:

  • Simultaneously webstream all programming broadcast on Channel 27
  • Develop a program schedule available to the public within 6 weeks of assuming services on Sept. 12
  • Include Half Moon Bay residents in its board of directors and hold board meetings open to the public
  • Provide media production services open to local residents including training and workshops, as well as access to equipment, a community studio and media lab
  •  Operate and maintain a message board to the community which will provide emergency information, program schedules, and community announcements
  • Secure copyright and distribution rights which allows for Pacifica Community Television-produced content to be distributed to the public by request 
  • Report back to the city on an annual basis with operations and performance data which includes financial information, results of annual viewer survey, equipment inventory, and activities held throughout the year such as workshops.

Under the contract with the county, Pacifica Community Television will also be required to live broadcast all Board of Supervisors meetings and Midcoast Community Council meetings. In addition, the station will be required to expand board of directors leadership to unincorporated San Mateo County Coastside residents as well as provide workshops, training, and equipment and studio access to these residents.

Half Moon Bay city staff report dated June 7 (see attached PDF) say that the contract with Pacifica Community Television will exceed services currently provided by MCTV. Such services named include "a committment to live coverage to City Council study sessions, increased community access through a social media hub and user surveys, expertise in local origination programming, increased public participation and support with 10 interns and over 100 volunteers and enhanced training opportunities to the public," the staff report read.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?