.
Feedback

Endangered Status Sought for Great White Sharks Off California Coast

The tables have turned: sharks are under attack by man.

In the past three years, shark attacks have increased 25 percent worldwide, according to an International Shark Attack File report, yet recent findings prove that the numbers of adult great white sharks off the coast of California and Baja California, Mexico, are alarmingly low.

Here in Half Moon Bay, which is part of a region known as the Red Triangle extending off the coast from Bodega Bay out slightly beyond the Farallon Islands and down the coast to Big Sur, shark sightings and attacks have been reported over the years despite the populations of great white sharks dwindling.

In 2005, Half Moon Bay surfers Tim West and Chris Loeswick surfing Mavericks escaped the bite of what was determined to be a a 12- to 14-foot, one-ton white shark. And a number of shark sightings have been reported on SurfPulse at Linda Mar in Pacifica over recent years.

Still, great white sharks are on the brink of extinction because of their low population size and the ongoing threats they faces from human activities.

“It's tragic for sharks, and tragic for the ecosystem,” writes John McCosker, a great white shark expert and chair of the Department of Aquatic Biology at the California Academy of Sciences. “Sharks are top-level predators for the ocean ecosystem. And the oceans are collapsing. When the sharks go, there are no controls,” says McCosker. “If there are no sharks, there are no safety checks.”

Tens of millions of sharks are being killed each year for the Asian sharkfin soup market. Their fins are hacked off and the sharks are dumped back into the ocean to die.

"As a keystone predator at the top of the food chain, and as a "k-selected" species with extremely low reproductive rates for a fish (4-11 pups every other year), older age of first breeding, and dependence on high survival rates, the white shark is extremely vulnerable to any extra man-assisted mortality and should be protected," said Peter Pyle, a biologist with the Institute for Bird Populations who did shark research working for the Point Reyes Bird Observatory from 1980 to 2003.

As a result of the shark's vulnerability, Oceana, the Center for Biological Diversity, and SharkStewards filed a scientific petition with the National Marine Fisheries Service in Washington D.C. seeking to protect the U.S. West Coast population of great white sharks under the Endangered Species Act.

This week, they will also seek protection under California’s Endangered Species Act. An Endangered Species Act listing will afford the sharks protections from key threats and garner funding for research to better understand the status and threats to this distinctive population of  white sharks.

“The new science set off alarm bells for all of us, as no one expected the population to be so dangerously low,” said Oceana’s California program director, Dr. Geoff Shester. “Great White sharks are powerful allies keeping our oceans healthy, and they need us to protect them far more than we should fear them.”

Great white sharks found off the U.S. West Coast are part of the Northeastern Pacific population, genetically distinct and isolated from all other great white sharks around the globe. In 2011, new scientific studies produced the first population estimates of West Coast adult and sub-adult great white sharks, together totaling fewer than 350 sharks — far lower numbers than researchers expected, presenting an inherently high extinction risk. The continued existence of white sharks is also hampered by their low reproductive output, slow growth rate, late maturity, and high mortality rates during the first year.

"When we proposed protection of the white shark in California in 1994 (California AB 522) we had 24 user groups comment on the bill and all 24 were in favor of protection, including surfers, kayakers, and divers. The Surfrider Foundation was one of the strongest supporter. We argued that a healthy white shark population would keep the seal and sea-lion populations in check, which would in turn help our salmon and halibut fisheries, and I believe that this has indeed occurred," said Pyle.

Deadly gillnets capture and kill great white sharks, and are presently the leading threat to their survival. While their direct capture for sale is prohibited off the coasts of California and Mexico, young great white sharks are killed as incidental bycatch in commercial fishing. Set and drift gillnets, which together target  California halibut, white sea bass, thresher sharks and swordfish, are responsible for over 80 percent of the reported young white sharks caught in their nursery grounds. These fisheries have very low observer coverage, meaning more white sharks are caught than what is reported.

“The fierce great white shark is no match for gillnets that are like curtains of death for marine animals. There are so few of these majestic sharks left in our waters, they urgently need protection,” said Catherine Kilduff, attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity.

Young great white sharks off the Southern California coast are also found to have the second highest mercury level on record for any sharks worldwide, six times higher than levels shown to cause physiological harm to other ocean fish species.

In addition, these sharks had the highest levels of the contaminants PCB and DDT in liver tissue observed in any shark species reported to date globally.

“These majestic predators are vital for the health and balance of our ocean ecosystems,” said David McGuire, director of SharkStewards. “Even the removal of one sexually mature individual from a population this small can have serious impacts on the population as a whole. They need stronger protection immediately.”

— Information courtesy of SharkStewards. Additional reporting by Christa Bigue.

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook |Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?