.
Feedback

Bay Area Gas Stations Some of the First to Sell Algae-Based Fuel

The algae-based gasoline will not only allow some vehicles to consume less gasoline, it is also better for the environment.

If you passed by the Propel gas station — the Valero at 503 Whipple Ave.
in Redwood City — Tuesday and were wondering why a gaggle of news cameras were surrounding it, here's why.

The station became one of the first four in the world to start selling algae-based gasoline Tuesday, according to an article in the San Francisco Chronicle — making its customers "the first private citizens in the world to use a domestically grown product that could revolutionize the fuel industry."

According to Matt Horton, CEO of Redwood City-based Propel Fuels — which Patch just reported earlier this week is one of the fastest-growing companies in the Bay Area — the fuel is 20 percent algae and 80 percent petroleum, and is available to any vehicle that runs on diesel.

Horton said the fuel will not only allow some vehicles to consume less gasoline, it is better for the environment as well, as "it spews much less smog and ozone-depleting greenhouse gases."

Horton said the product, made from algae grown by the South San Francisco company Solazyme, has been used in trials by the military and industrial companies.

The Redwood City station, along with three other stations in San Jose, Berkeley and Oakland, will offer the fuel, called Biodiesel B20, for a month, after which time a decision will be made on whether to offer it full-time.

The fuel will be sold for just under $4.25 a gallon in Redwood City, which is on par with the average price of diesel fuel across California.

Read more about how the algae-based fuel is made in the San Francisco Chronicle's article here.

 

PATCH WANTS TO KNOW - Would you try Biodiesel B20 on your diesel-running vehicle? What do you think of the fuel's chances in the Bay Area, or the world? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below.

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

 

 


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.