.
Feedback

Bay Area Study Finds Toxic Polish at Nail Salons

Ten of 12 products which claimed to be free of toxic ingredients contained hazardous chemicals believed to cause respiratory harm, reproductive issues and cancer, spokesman says.

 

The California Department of Toxic Substances Control released a report Tuesday that found nail polishes sold in the Bay Area frequently contain chemicals toxic to nail salon customers and workers.

Department officials held a news conference Tuesday morning at Laney College's School of Cosmetology in Oakland to discuss the hazardous chemicals in nail polish and reveal the findings of their report.

According to Karl Palmer, a spokesman for the DTSC, the study tested 25 random nail polish products for sale by six distributors in the San Francisco Bay Area. The report showed that 10 of the 12 products that claimed to be free of toxic ingredients on their labels in fact contained hazardous chemicals.

Palmer said three chemicals known as the "toxic trio" were prevalent in the polish. The chemicals toluene, dibutyl phthalate, and formaldehyde make up the trio and are believed to cause respiratory harm, reproductive issues and cancer.

Palmer said a high level of inconsistency was discovered in product claims. He called for manufacturers who print false information on their packaging to adhere to state law for everyone's safety.

"We know and they know there is a hazardous chemical in it," Palmer said.

Hue Nguyen, a nail technician from Vietnam who works in San Leandro, spoke through an interpreter at this morning's press conference.

Nguyen said she had worked in a nail salon for eight years before being diagnosed with breast cancer in 2008. She said she is now in remission and works fewer hours.

"I know it is not good for my health to be exposed to the toxic chemicals 10 to 12 hours a day," Nguyen said.

Sushma Bhatia, the Toxics Reduction Program Manager at the San Francisco Department of the Environment, said that in San Francisco alone there are about 200 nail salons that employ about 18,000 nail technicians, most of whom are female.

"Manufacturers need to be prohibited from using the toxic trio. We need to be sure that labels are accurate," Bhatia said.

State Sen. Leland Yee, who authored a law in 2006 requiring sanitary conditions at nail salons said today that he wants to stiffen penalties for nail polish manufacturers who mislabel their products.

"There are no excuses for manufacturers to mislabel their products. If they can't clean up their act on their own, then we have no choice but to force those changes by law," Yee said in a statement today.

Yee said he plans to review existing penalties to determine if they should be increased or if particular chemicals should be banned outright.

-Bay City News

Got Patch? Sign up for our newsletter by clicking on the "Patch Newsletter" link on the top right of our homepage.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?