.
Feedback

Council Bans Foam Takeout Containers

Supporters cite impact on marine health, while hygiene is reason for not including prepackaged food containers.

Food vendors in Half Moon Bay will soon be banned from using plastic foam takeout containers after the City Council unanimously approved an ordinance last night that requires all containers be made of reusable, recyclable, compostable and/or biodegradable materials.

The ordinance will go into effect on Aug. 1. Food vendors can apply for an exemption by citing an "undue hardship" in complying with the policy. Violations of the ordinance will be fined $100 for a first offense, $200 for a repeat offense and $500 for the third violation.

Also known as polystyrene or by the brand name Styrofoam, plastic foam is neither biodegradable nor recyclable. The material is petroleum-based and can leach chemicals into the food or drink inside the container, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

No opposition to the ordinance was brought to the council, with the exception of a letter from the American Chemistry Council.

Leaders of local environmental groups Coastside Land Trust and Save Our Shores made public statements to the council in support of the ban. Both organizations worked with councilmember Marina Fraser to bring the ordinance to the council's attention, while San Mateo County Environmental Health Director Dean Peterson was credited with bringing the idea for a ban to the a year ago.

Jo Chamberlain, Executive Director of the in Half Moon Bay, told the council that her organization supported the ordinance. "We have found a significant amount of polystyrene material and have picked a lot of it up" during the group's cleanups at beaches and conservation easements in Half Moon Bay, she said.

"We have seen animals eating this and dead birds with this material in them," Chamberlain said.

Bans on Styrofoam takeout containers have had a noticeable effect on the amount that ends up littered on the beach, said Laura Kasa of Santa Cruz-based Save Our Shores in a statement to the council. Kasa referred to a ban passed in Santa Cruz County as an example.

"We've seen a 50 percent decrease," she said of the amount of Styrofoam that volunteers pick up at the 200 beach cleanups the organization runs a year. "It used to be 12 pieces per cleanup and it's now cut down to six pieces," Kasa said. Santa Cruz County passed its ban in 2008.

During last month's at , Kasa said that the organization counted 17 pieces of Styrofoam collected by volunteers. "That's much higher than average," she said.

Kasa concluded her remarks by asking councilmembers to include Styrofoam coolers  (ice chests) in the ordinance. "You think they'll be reused but they're left in the trash can and they're impossible to clean up," she said, adding that the coolers break into small pieces after disposal. Kasa said that Save Our Shores picked up 200 small pieces of Styrofoam at a recent beach cleanup.

Despite Kasa's plea, the council was hesitant to amend the ordinance to include Styrofoam coolers.

"We need to look at alternatives people can sell to visitors who visit our beaches," said Fraser.

Councilmember John Muller said that banning Styrofoam coolers could have an impact on fishermen at Pillar Point Harbor.

"We have to be sensitive...not to do anything to damage what little business they have from selling fish off their boats," he said.

Peterson said to the council that San Mateo County's Environmental Health Department had a concern about banning polystyrene-based foam as material used for prepackaged food due to hygiene issues. "We prefer polystyrene containers for packging of fish and meat," he said, adding that it was considered to be the best type of packaging material for fish and meat in regards to hygiene.

Though Styrofoam coolers were not included in the ordinance that passed, Kasa was pleased with the outcome.

"Save Our Shores is thrilled with the leadership the Half Moon Bay City Council has taken with passing this ordinance," she said. "By eliminating use of harmful products such as polystyrene food containers, we  will surely improve the health of our marine environment."

Several other Peninsula cities, including Burlingame, Millbrae, Pacifica, San Bruno and South San Francisco, have already passed similar bans. In 2008, San Mateo County passed a policy that applies to all county departments, agencies and contractors. Earlier this year, the county Board of Supervisors passed a ban targeting its unincorporated areas which will go into effect on July. 1.

For a copy of the ordinance, view the PDF document attached in the media box to the right.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.