.
Feedback

HMB Orchids to Pay Damages for Environmental Pollution and Workplace Violations

District Attorney announces $139K final judgment against the commercial flower company business on Frenchman’s Creek Road.

, a commercial flower company off Frenchman’s Creek Road that does business under the name of Half Moon Bay Orchids, allegedly violated various environmental and workplace safety laws and regulations, and now they have to pay for it.

The Consumer and Environmental Unit of the District Attorney’s Office on Thursday obtained a final judgment against Challenge Horticulture, Inc. for polluting the waterways of Loess Creek — which drains into Frenchman's Creek and the Pacific Ocean — by failing to prevent petroleum from passing into the waterway and disposing of hazardous waste at an unauthorized point.

The complaint also alleges that Challenge Horticulture, Inc. diverted or obstructed a stream without prior authorization from the Department of Fish and Game and failed to immediately report the release of hazardous materials to the proper authorities, obtain a project permit from CalOSHA, and protect employees in an excavation from cave-ins by an adequate protective system.

Pollution to these waterways caused by siltation, erosion, rocks, runoff, and/or hazardous substances damages the waterways and affects the areas’ wildlife and vegetation, according to the California Department of Fish and Game, which worked with the District Attorney’s Office and county Environmental Health Division in this civil enforcement action.

The District Attorney’s civil complaint alleges two separate violations, according to a report from DA Steve Wagstaffe.

The first violation was reported on Nov. 9, 2009 by a California Department of Fish and Game warden who saw Challenge Horticulture, Inc. employees altering and disturbing the bed and bank of a portion of Frenchman’s Creek without prior notification to, and permits from, the Department of Fish and Game, Water Resources Board, San Mateo County, California Division of Occupational Safety and Health, or any other governmental agency.

The employees were in the process of installing a new system for pumping water from Loess Creek to support commercial operations on the property. 

The second incident occurred end of June 2010.

The complaint alleges that Challenge Horticulture, Inc. employees were demolishing a structure on the company’s property and, in so doing, unintentionally damaged a ground-level pipe that connected to three above-ground storage tanks. 

Each tank was capable of holding approximately 10,000 gallons. 

One of the tanks contained thousands of gallons of red dye diesel. 

The damaged pipe began releasing red dye diesel into the soil, where it spread to Loess Creek, Frenchman’s Creek, and ultimately to the Pacific Ocean. 

The release resulted in soil and waterway pollution and contamination.

Based on these two incidents, the judgment requires a full compliance with applicable environmental protection and workplace safety laws and regulations and the payment of $139K in civil penalties and reimbursement of enforcement and emergency response costs.

In the stipulated judgment, Challenge Horticulture, Inc. agreed to cease the conduct alleged by the District Attorney’s civil complaint and consented to a court injunction barring the conduct in the future.

The company cooperated in the resolution of the case and has taken action to clean up the released diesel.

Got Patch? Sign up for our newsletter by clicking on the "Patch Newsletter" link on the top right of our homepage.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.