.
Feedback

Jeff Clark Emerges Victorious in Legal Battle Against Mavericks Surf Ventures

Order handed down in San Francisco County Superior Court.

After a prolonged battle with longtime surf contest organizer Mavericks Surf Ventures, veteran surfer and Half Moon Bay native has emerged victorious against the company he originally co-founded.

Handed down on July 14 in San Francisco County Superior Court by Judge Peter Busch, the court order requires the company to pay the surfer for damages related to its business conduct with Clark, including breached contracts, self-dealing and a failure to honor their original agreements with him.

Known the world over as the founder of the located less than a mile past Pillar Point Harbor just outside Half Moon Bay, Clark originally founded Mavericks Surf Ventures with Evolve Sports in 2003, five years after the very first contest took place.

Clark served as contest director of Mavericks Surf Ventures as well as on the company's board of directors.

In 2009, Clark was terminated as contest director, which led him to immediately resign from the board.

Clark's ousting led him to file a complaint against the company and its directors, Keir Beadling and Mark Dwight, in January 2010 for breached contracts with Clark and its shareholders, along with the withholding of payments.

Two months later, a mediated agreement required Mavericks Surf Ventures to pay Clark through the year 2017.

The company did not follow through with the agreement, which prompted Clark to file suit again and bring forth a motion for a summary judgement. 

Judge Busch's order stated that there was “uncontroverted evidence that the parties had entered into a valid and enforceable contract,” and that the company had failed to honor that contract.

“When I signed on to partner with Keir and Evolve Sports, I trusted them to do the right thing, to honor my spirit and passion for surfing,” Clark said in a statement in 2010. “I made a mistake and I trusted the wrong people. They refused to honor the contracts they created and turned the contest into a circus.”

A spokeswoman for Clark said yesterday that he did not have any comment on the court order.

In June, Clark came forward and stated his interest in running this year's Mavericks Surf Contest at a meeting of the San Mateo County Harbor Commissioners where the group was set to review a bid to run the contest submitted by Mavericks Community LLC, a group led by his ex-wife Katherine Kelly Clark. 

The resulted in the Commission denying the permit to Mavericks Community LLC, and delaying the decision until August. At that meeting, Jeff Clark announced that he would submit a permit application to the board for consideration at its first meeting in August.

On Wednesday at the August 3 meeting of the San Mateo County Harbor Commission, it was revealed that . As a result, Harbor District General Manager Peter Grenell asked the commissioners to consider pushing back the discussion on the Mavericks contest permit to its next meeting on August 17.

To read Half Moon Bay Patch's report of this meeting, click .

Keep updated with news from Half Moon Bay Patch by liking us on Facebook here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?