.
Feedback

Peninsula Resident Up to Something Good

The potential benefits of this new medical technology can effect 42 million women and 25 million men annually.

If you could invest in something that could advance medical technology and ease suffering, would you? San Carlos resident Richard Hular is betting on it.

He's in the midst of developing, along with a crew of capable workers, a probe that would unobtrusively perform a biopsy without having to remove tissue.


For 12 years Hular has been in search of funding for the hand-held instrument that would cause no damage. His goal is $33 million, which could lead to easing the suffering of millions.

"My ex-wife developed breast cancer and I comforted her," Hular said. "The procedure was just terrible, sending a probe in to get some tissue for a biopsy. She went through three surgeries. Right away, in a light bulb moment, I began thinking of a hand held device. It was time to start my own company."

That was in 2000 and he's done nothing else since than to work on the project. With an engineering background, Hular set about to advance his cause.

"We have achieved a major breakthrough in cancer detection and treatment," Hular said. "The current fundraising environment for startup companies in Silicon Valley is at a historic low, because of the global economic issues. As a result of this situation, we have made a conscious decision to reach out to individuals and corporations that might be interested in sponsoring or investing in our significant effort."

Hular is the CEO of BioLuminate, which has successfully combined Computer and Telecommunications components, Lasers, Physics, unique Engineering & Software, and Biology, to solve a difficult problem in cancer detection and treatment. The company utilizes technology developed at NASA Ames, Lawrence Livermore, and the Los Alamos National Laboratories.

The potential benefits of this technology can effect 42 million women annually, for the breast cancer application, and 25 million men for the prostate cancer application. This technology can also be utilized for all other solid forms of cancer, and would ultimately save billions in annual health-care costs.

"Right now we are working diligently to raise $33 million for a Series C private financing," Hular said. "In addition, we would also like to raise a small amount of funding quickly, in order to maintain our limited operations and allow us to continue critical patent filing efforts in the US, Europe, and Canada, which are all time sensitive. Our primary patent just issued a few months ago in the US."

Dennis Matthews, Ph.D., the Director of the UC Davis Center for BioPhotonics Science and Technology, has endorsed Hular's attempts.

"We're in the hardest of all areas in which to make significant contributions, and that is developing technology to detect and treat cancer," Matthews wrote in '40 Years of Discovery, a publication of the Regents of the University of California.' "The development that may have the greatest effect is the sensitive detection of biomarkers, either genes or proteins, which would indicate a cancer or precancerous condition."

Other endorsements have come from Santosh Kesari, M.D., Ph.D., Director of Neuro-Oncology at the Moores UCSD Cancer Center, and the Translational Neuro-Oncology Laboratories, and Dr. Ernie Bodai M.D., F.A.C.S., Director of Breast Surgical Services, Kaiser Permanente-Capital Services Area.


For more information, visit the BioLuminate website.


Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here








Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.