.
Feedback

San Mateo Supes Consider Agri-Tourism

Board of Supervisors delay making changes to farmland zoning that would free farmers to tap into agri-tourism business.

Should farmland be dedicated to agricultural operations only or also allow for other land uses like a carnival, and if so how much? That’s the question currently on the board table for the San Mateo County Supervisors.

At a meeting last week, Supervisors voted to consider making changes to farmland zoning that would free farmers to tap into agri-tourism business.  

They have been working specifically with the proprietors at Arata Farms in Half Moon Bay, which has added a giant hay-bale maze, haunted house and a sword fight arena in recent years to bring in visitors and more revenue. Arata grows pumpkins and corn but has come under scrutiny for using up more land for attractions than agriculture.

“We didn't approve or authorize an amendment to the Williamson Act contract on the Arata Pumpkin farm," said San Mateo County Board Supervisor Don Horsley. "We do have the guidelines for agri-tourism but we didn't approve or review the guidelines. Instead we voted to consider the application at a later meeting and appointed a subcommittee to review the guidelines.”

The Williamson Act offers tax breaks to farmers for keeping prime agricultural land in production. But specific uses are set by county contracts. 

If approved, the new rules would allow for such uses if they’re considered compatible with agricultural operations.

The Board of Supervisors consideration to table the issue until next month’s meeting coincides with Arata landowners Lillian Arata and Gary Arata reaching a settlement last Friday over their differences of what was best for the land.

Last year, the aunt and nephew went to court over a disagreement about how the land was being used, according to the Half Moon Bay Review. Gary Arata supported the agri-tourism side of the farm while Lillian said it was inconsistent with the property’s zoning, according to the recent Review article. As part of the settlement, Gary Arata agreed to purchase the remaining 50 percent of his aunt’s share of the parcel.

Horsley doesn’t think that it is in the long-term interest of having a sustainable agriculture community if former farmland is turned into carnival type activities.

“Sustainable agriculture means that food grown locally supplies local markets with fresh food rather than trucking in food from distant locations,” he said. “So, it is good for the environment, good for reducing green house gases and good for the local economy. I might also add that farmers are good managers of the land.”

Still, Horsley acknowledges that it’s a good thing to allow other land uses for farmers in Half Moon Bay because it's very difficult to run a successful agriculture business.

“Markets and weather are unpredictable and the regulatory environment that has been imposed on farmers makes it difficult to earn a living on a family farm," Horsley said. "To be economically sustainable, some operations would like the flexibility of being able to capitalize on the growing interest on the part of the public to visit farms, especially during specific times of the years such as the months of October and December.”

At this time, however, Horsley says they need more time to consider all of the issues and ramifications of various options, but is hopeful that “the outcome will be good for the community as well as for the applicant.”

 

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?