.
Feedback

Once-Competing Surf Groups Now Seeking Joint Mavericks Contest Permit

Jeff Clark's Mavericks Surf Company and Katherine Kelly Clark's Mavericks Community in discussion to apply together for permit.

The San Mateo County Harbor District's Board of Harbor Commissioners met Wednesday in Half Moon Bay to discuss the permit approval for the Mavericks Surf Contest and the appropriate method of discounting berthing fees for commercial fishermen.

The pending decision to approve the permit for the Mavericks Surf Contest has caused high tension in the Harbor District due to the competition between the new Mavericks Community, LLC and Mavericks Surf Company, LLC.

At a June 1 meeting, Mavericks Surf Contest founder, Jeff Clark, criticized the permit bid from Mavericks Community, headed by Clark’s ex-wife Katherine Kelly Clark, for the absence of a safety plan and lack of communication with the community.

However, Wednesday night’s meeting produced a more communal atmosphere in the contest to manage this year’s surf contest.

“I’ve been made aware by both applicants that they’re working on creating a single joint unified application,” said Harbor District General Manager Peter Grenell. “We want to give them time to do what they need to do.”

Grenell asked the board to postpone their decision to August 17 in order to approve a comprehensive permit.

“Both applicants have indicated that they want to give us more information,” he said.

One of the applicants was unable to attend the meeting due to travel plans made prior to the scheduled meeting, Grenell said.

“It’s really good news,” said surfer and Princeton business owner Brian Overfelt. “We’re working together to make one permit. I’m really happy about it and there’s been a lot of positive movement.”

The board voted unanimously approved to postpone the decision until August 17.

Grenell commented that throughout the process of collaboration the Harbor District will remain accessible to the applicants.

“We are totally open to whatever communication you need with us,” Grenell said. “We’ll make ourselves available as needed.”

The qualifications of berthing fee discounts came into question after confusion arose amongst commercial fishermen. Board President Pietro Parravano, who owns a boat in the harbor, excused himself to avoid conflict of interest.

“Basically the applications are indicating that there is some confusion on the qualifications being used,” Grenell said.

There are currently two separate systems concerning berthing discounts, he said.

“There was an older set of qualifications in the Harbor District ordinance code,” Grenell said.  The Harbor District staff acknowledged the need to have a uniform discount method in the future.

But the larger concern was the implementation of berthing fee increases and the rumors that have circulated between fishermen throughout Half Moon Bay about new criteria for berthing fees and discounts.

“At times like this when tensions are high and not a lot of fish are being caught rumors go far big time,” said fisherman Jim Anderson.

Commissioner James Tucker responded by saying that unless one hears news from the Board of Commissioners they shouldn’t be alarmed by rumors.

“Rumors are rumors can’t control the rumors,” Tucker said.

Grenell offered the suggestion of a payment plan. The commissioners spoke in terms of a possible 24 percent increase to berthing fees for those fishermen who do not qualify for discounts.

“The Harbor District has provided payment plans in the past. These things, for the most part, have been honored and paid off,” Grenell said.

Tucker proposed a 12 percent fee increase this fiscal year and a 12 percent fee increase next year in order to lessen the financial blow to fishermen.

Grenell said this plan sounds “potentially feasible.”

The commissioners decided to allow the staff to look into the potential of Tucker’s proposal and resume discussion at a later time.

The next scheduled San Mateo County Harbor District Board of Harbor Commissioners meeting will be held August 17 at 7 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building in South San Francisco.

Keep updated with news from Half Moon Bay Patch by liking us on Facebook here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
George Muteff May 15, 2013 at 06:52 pm
I'm not particularly thrilled with yet another big corporate fast food store in HMB. I'm not a realRead More Taco Bell fan either, but I have noticed that Taco Bell and KFC are one in the same at many locations. I'm wondering if that will be the case here. Will this store include KFC? Anyone know?
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
pae May 13, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Most dogs and horses can get along fine, if they have the opportunity to be socialized to eachRead More other. If dogs never get to see horses, or vice versa, then there is a startle/fear response, and each will respond according to its temperament. Remove all opportunities for this socialization, as GGNRA wants to do, and there will be more problems. Apparently GGNRA has even ordered stable owners not to allow equestrians to bring their dogs to the stable any more, which is grossly unfair to all concerned. GGNRA just hates dogs, and their policies have been written accordingly. It is unfathomable that here on the Coastside, surrounded by miles of open space, there is no legal area except one small dog park, for dog owners to walk with their companions off leash. Horses, bicycles and people have full access, but dog owners very limited access, and no access for off leash exercising. Rancho territory is 6 1/2 square miles. Surely there is enough room for all recreation! It's our tax money, too, but we're being denied use of the space we own.