.
Feedback

SamTrans Reaches Three-Year Agreement With Bus Operators, Maintenance Workers

The agreement calls for no wage increases for the first two years.

The San Mateo County Transit District announced Friday the agency has reached a three-year agreement with its bus operators and maintenance employees.

The agreement, which went into effect Sept. 6, calls for a wage freeze in the first two years, agency spokeswoman Christine Dunn said. The third year of the contract calls for a 2.5 percent wage increase, as long as there are no significant changes that affect passenger fare and sales tax revenues.

Employees will also begin contributing to the monthly premium costs for health coverage – 3 percent in the first year, an additional 3 percent in the second year and an additional 4 percent in the third year, a total of 10 percent phased in over three years, under the new agreement.

The agreement also calls for employees to begin paying a portion of the employee contribution to the PERS retirement system. Under the new agreement, employees will pay 2 percent in the first year, an additional 2 percent in the second year and an additional 1 percent in the third year, a total of 5 percent phased in over three years.

The changes in healthcare and pension contributions also will apply to non-represented employees, Dunn said.

The new agreement also establishes a second-tier retirement program. Employees currently receive a pension calculated at 2 percent at 55. Once the new retirement program is established, new employees will receive a pension calculated at 2 percent at 60.

These changes help the transit district to stay within its adopted budget for the current Fiscal Year 2012.

“This new agreement is fiscally constrained and reflects the tough times we are in,” SamTrans General Manager Michael J. Scanlon said in a statement

“We can get through these hard times by working together, all of us pulling on the rope in the same direction. What makes that possible is fairness – sharing the good times, sharing the hard times together,” he said.

The San Mateo County Transit District employs 667 employees who serve three agencies consolidated into one organization:SamTrans, the bus and paratransit provider for San Mateo County; Caltrain, the Peninsula commuter rail service; and the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, which implements the proceeds from a half-cent sales tax dedicated to transportation projects in San Mateo County.

Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1574, the employees with whom the new agreement was reached, represents the 383 operators and maintenance employees.

In the prior two years, this unit received previously negotiated wage increases, and non-represented employees received their last salary increase in 2008.

 

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.