.
Feedback

League of Women Voters meeting on Initiative and Referendum

 ,   Add to calendar
 1300 S El Camino Real San Mateo CA 94402  See map

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS MEETINGS ON INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM PROCESS IN CALIFORNIA


Tuesday, February 19, 2013


1-3 pm Silicon Valley Community Foundation Conference Center 1300 El Camino Real, San Mateo


7-9 pm League of Women Voters of North and Central San Mateo County office, 444 Peninsula Avenue, Suite 1, San Mateo, 94401


These are duplicate meetings.  Choose the meeting time that best fits your schedule.


These meetings will present background information about the California Initiative and Referendum process.


The subject will be continued in March 19th meetings at the same times and places.


 Californians have a 101 year history of direct democracy with the initiative, referendum and recall. Pushed by Governor Hiram Johnson, and adopted in 1911, the system was intended to give citizens power over a corrupt legislature. But special interests spent $372 million advocating or attacking the 11 ballot measures on the November 2012 ballot—a far cry from the original concept. 


The League of Women Voters of California has a history of seeking reforms in the process.  The timing for the reform of California‘s Initiative and Referendum system has never been as opportune as it is now. This discussion will include issues such as limiting paid signature gatherers, changing the time or number of signatures required to qualify an initiative for the ballot, and considering various ideas which define how the content of an initiative should be limited. Other issues are drafting, pre-review, titling and summary before signatures are gathered, what it takes to qualify for the ballot, how much the Legislature should be integrated in the process, and whether the State Constitution should be allowed to be amended by the initiative.


For more information, see http://www.cafwd.org/reporting/entry/league-of-women-voters-time-for-new-views-on-cas-initiative-process


The public is invited to join in the discussions, but only League members will vote on the policy positions that will be adopted by the League based on these discussions, which are taking place statewide.

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.