.
Feedback

I Have to Admit It - I Have A Bit of a Problem

I collect cameras. Not old vintage cameras like you see at the camera store up on the back shelf. No, I collect working cameras.

I have to admit my problem: I can't say no to a new camera. I collect them, but not like you think. I don't have a long line of vintage cameras like you see neatly organized on the back of the case at the camera store - kind of a mini camera museum of photographing history. No, I collect working cameras.

The criteria for me to get a new camera is that it has to be unique - it will do something no other camera I already own does. Of course, a lot of photographers have that rule and they collect Nikons to go with their Canons. They collect mini-cameras for when the bigger body units are too cumbersome for the job at hand. And they may collect cameras that take a certain format photo.

I had two basic cameras for when I am out taking photos: my Canon 40D which is my workhorse, go-to camera. I know a lot of people who are really good photographers have upgraded/graduated to the 7D. I have friends who use the 7D and don't get me wrong - it is a beautiful camera. But for a DSLR, it almost does too many things for me. I didn't really start taking photos until I got my first digital camera, a Sony Mavica that used a floppy disk, if you can believe that!

I went from the Sony to a Kodak digital camera, which I liked. Then, I got a Fuji but these cameras didn't have good lenses. I wanted to be able to zoom in, change my exposure time or aperature or my focus. I got the Canon 40D in 2008 and I have loved it ever since. But I still have other cameras for different needs.

You probably have my next favorite camera, the iPhone. This camera takes good, fast close ups. The colors are amazing, and it is so quick and easy to use. I can get short videos if I really want to, so another reason I don't need the 7D. And with the iCloud, I can get at the photos on my laptop. I use the iPhone for photography and also to take a picture of my parking space number, my shopping list, or things I want to remember later.

I have an old Polaroid for doing image transfers that I love, but don't use too often. They started making the film for these again last year, so this is an area of experimentation for me. The newer and more photographically reliable "polaroid" like camera is the Fuji Instax, which I have. I wish the film format was slightly larger, but it is a fun camera to use to take artsy photos with. I first saw it when Zooey Deschanel used it in Yes Man (the movie). I immediately had to have one. I use it infrequently, but wouldn't trade it for the world.

My most recent camera acquisition is the Lytro light field camera. It has a very unique shape and size - it is about the size of a slide viewer. Square and approximately five inches long. The Lytro's main feature is that you can change the focus point after you take the photo. Lytro's sensor system and software allow you to zoom in and out and move the focus point around as a viewer. What I may like as the center of attention may be different that what you as a viewer would prefer to have in focus. You can read more about the Lytro here.

I would someday like to have a smaller format DSLR that takes really good photos, something like the Lumix/Panasonic. But a camera like that is just a hybrid of what I can get with my iPhone or my Canon 40D, so it would be yet one more thing to keep track of cords, chips, and the camera itself in my bag.

The Lytro is a nice, fresh, new toy that I will keep playing with. I don't like that it has only serial downloading of images to my hard drive, and if you take a batch of photos, say 20 or more, it seems to take forever for them to download to the Lytro software on my computer. I also heard that it won't work if you only have a PC. I'm a Mac girl so that isn't an issue for me, but really? That's a bit of a shortcoming, I think.

So there you have it. I've admitted my problem. I am (relatively) powerless to say no to a quirky new camera. And, I am thankful there haven't been too many advances in the technology lately.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?