.
Feedback

Due to Restoration, No Lens Lighting at Pigeon Point Lighthouse This Year

Fresnel lens to be removed from lighthouse tower instead of set aglow for annual Pescadero event.

Visitors to the Pigeon Point Lighthouse who return each year for the annual mid-November lens lighting will have to stay home this year — and likely for the next few years as well.

The 2011 event was cancelled because the lens needs to be moved before the lighthouse restoration can begin, according to an update written for the website of the San Mateo Coast Natural History Association by Julie Barrow, Docent Coordinator at the Pigeon Point Light Station Historic Park in Pescadero.

The lens is expected to be moved in November, according to the history association.

Instead of illuminating the South Coast for the one night a year that the lens is put into service, it will be awaiting transfer to an adjacent fog signal building where it will stay for the next few years to avoid damage during the restoration process.

As the history association reported in its July newsletter, State Parks San Mateo Coast Sector Superintendent Paul Keel said that the lighthouse built in 1871 has been in need of restoration since 2001.

Even before it was deemed structurally unsound ten years ago, two sections of the iron "belt course" that surrounds the lighthouse tower broke off from the tower, the history association reported.

According to the history association's July newsletter, Keel said that "inadequate maintenance" and the "severe coastal environment" are the reasons behind the lighthouse's need for restoration.

The newsletter also reports that the lower tower of the lighthouse and oil house need to be restored as well.

According to Keel, the Hind Foundation is paying for the costs to remove the lens through a $175,000 grant.

The entire restoration is estimated to cost nine to ten million dollars and could take up to five years to complete, the history association notes.

See what the lighthouse looks when its Fresnel lens is lit up by watching the video in the media box to the right of this article.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.