.
Feedback

Legislature Rolls the Dice on State Budget

This article was contributed by Paul Stewart, a veteran of public policy, legislative and political battles.

Doubtless you’ve read that the legislature adopted a state budget. And to comply with the law (and so they can get paid), the solons got it out on time and balanced but negotiations continue via ‘trailer bills.’ (No, not like in a trailer park but bills that ‘trail’ a major piece of legislation and contain funding components to make it work.)

Ah, but what’s balanced on paper in reality hangs by a single horsehair as did the Sword of Damocles.

BTW: The Damocles thing is often referenced improperly with the sword of Damocles representing great peril – which it does – but it actually illustrates that anybody who has immense wealth, luxury, power and the feeling of security that engenders also is not paying attention to the proverbial other side of the coin (don’t you just love mixed metaphors?) and is living under an equally dangerous threat.

O.K, here are the basics: the state needs the Governor’s November Income Tax/Sales Tax Initiative to pass. The balancing of the budget is predicated on its’ passage. So one would think the Legislature and the Governor would do nothing to upset what appears to be a slight favoring of the proposal. Recent Field Poll results show the Gov's measure is sampling at 54%yes and 38% nada. Meanwhile, the “Our Children, Our Future” (AKA the Millionaire Tax) Initiative is a dead heat, 46%-46%.

And here is where the Legislature is rollin’ the bones, big time. It’s the number of "yes" voters for JB’s tax measure who say they were less likely to support his plan IF the Legislature approved funds for high speed rail (AKA the Bullet Train).

It’s a whopping 21% of voters... and guess what the Legislature did last Friday? Yep, $69 Billion for a train that will initially take people from Merced to Bakersfield. So for grins, let’s say 50% of those voters polled about the Bullet Train/Tax Measure were bluffing.

That still basically flips the percentages and the Governor’s measure rolls snake eyes.

So here are your budget scenarios: If the Gov’s measure fails… if the “Our Children, Our Future” measure passes by more than the Governor’s proposal (thus taking precedent)… or if they both fail: The budget goes down in flames.

Now comes the fun. Put all the money in and let’s roll ‘em again: That same polling data noted a mongo 72% of all voters already disapprove of the trigger cuts that will befall education if the Gov’s tax measure fails.

I’ve commented about this previously… there are a series of budget cuts which automatically kick in if the state doesn’t achieve the anticipated revenue it needs to make the budget work… which includes approval of the Governor’s tax initiative. The bulk of these cuts will be to education, with the more drastic tier of cuts aimed at nothing but education. And this is beyond what has already taken place. Believe me, the folks at the K-12, community college and UC/CA state college system levels are sweaty of palm.

But don’t worry… if the tax measure is not approved, you can count on an instantaneous bipartisan juggernaut to undo the trigger cuts to K-12 as the prospects of shortened the school year materialize (down to 160 days) and the cuts will be shifted to non-K12 programs. WARNING - Massive understatement  to follow: While a certain amount of rollover deficit to FY2013-14 is possible, the state is likely to have a major cash problem if the tax measure fails. Ya think? Come on 7’s!

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?