.
Feedback

Coastside Fire Protection District Special Recall Election Guide

The candidates, voting information and issues that will be affecting the Coast.

Recall Election campaign signs for Vote No on the Recall and Keep CalFire are posted all over town. Four candidates have filed to run in the Recall Election for the Coastside Fire Protection District. The San Mateo Elections Division is testing the eSlate voting system equipment for the Special Recall Election this week. And by now you’ve received in the mail a sample ballot and a voter information pamphlet for the Coastside Fire Protection District Special Recall Election.

Now it’s almost time to vote. From March 11 to April 2, voters can vote by mail. From March 11 to April 9, voters can vote at the Elections Division in person at 40 Tower Road in San Mateo. Or, on Tuesday, April 9, voters can cast their ballots at local polls.

Your polling place location and precinct number are printed on the back of the pamphlet you should have received in the mail by now from the San Mateo County Elections Office.

Also inside this document is some helpful information, like a statement of reasons for why CalFire proponents seek to recall Coastside Fire Protection District Board of Directors Mike Alifano, Doug Mackintosh and Gary Riddell for voting against extending the CalFire contract after “refusing to listen to constituents or the recent Grand Jury report that said ‘The Grand Jury could not find any substantive issues that justified termination the CalFire contract.’” CalFire proponents also say that these three board members "abused the Brown Act, holding closed meetings under the guise of labor negotiations" and have spent move than "$100K in consulting and legal fees in an attempt to remove CalFire and bring back the 'local control' that failed us so badly in the past."

Each of the three officers being recalled respond to these statements in the pamphlet, explaining why they want to hold CalFire accountable because CalFire has failed its legal and moral obligations in a contract that they say is advantageous to CalFire, lacking in community involvement and support, resulting in high turnover and an unresponsiveness to the community, and undermining the level of fire service the Coast needs.

"Our job is to always be working on the best solution for the money, not choosing the cheapest option or contract," Alifano wrote in his statement. As an example, said Alifano, the contract calls for two full-time fire marshals. When these two fire marshals were moved to another area, those positions were not fully replaced. Instead, there are now two part-time fire marshals, one of which is retired, even though taxpayers are paying for two full-timers. Alifano, Riddell and Mackintosh say that CalFire makes decisions "without Board consent that will cost thousands if not tens of thousands of dollars and will negatively impact services levels specified in the contract."

When voting, Coastside residents will place their votes with either a yes or no to remove three members from the Coastside Fire Protection District Board of Directors seat. For every yes, voters will then need to vote for a director to succeed each recallee.

To help inform your vote, Patch asked all four candidates and three recallees the same three questions:

1. How much more or less will a standalone Coastside department cost the community?

2. How is the level of service of CalFire better or worse than the level of service of a standalone Coastside department?

3. Why Vote Yes or No on the Recall?

Click on the names of the candidates and officers being recalled to read their responses.

Officers to be recalled:

Mike Alifano

Doug Mackintosh

Gary Riddell

Directors to succeed:

Karen K. Anderson

JB Cockrell

Lee McKusick

Harvey Rarback

Keep up with local news — follow Patch


Sign up for Half Moon Bay Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter


Want to share your opinions with the communities of the Coastside? Start your
own blog here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?