.
Feedback

Father Charged With Kidnapping Faced Previous Lawsuits

Christopher Maffei has been brought to court several times before for breaking payment contracts.

Christopher Maffei, the man charged with kidnapping his own children from South San Francisco and stealing a yacht last week, has been brought to court several times before, according to San Mateo County Superior Court records.

In June 2009, a Mountain View-based real estate investing and staging company, successfully sued Maffei after "providing home staging for defendant's property." Earlier that year, the San Mateo Daily Journal successfully sued Maffei for not fulfilling payments in an advertising contract.

In October 2009, an oil company successfully sued Prosch & Maffei Builders for non-payment of fuel. In December of 2009, a company that provides rock for builders successfully sued Maffei.

In January 2010, a small loans corporation filed a lawsuit against Maffei for not paying installments for two Bobcat construction vehicles. That case was dismissed.

The current case against Maffei includes charges for stealing a yacht from a marina in Alameda.

The San Francisco Chronicle reported Tuesday night that Maffei said that he'd "gone crazy by stealing the boat," but that the kids were safe.

"Maffei insisted in the 45-minute interview that his children were never in danger while on the boat, adding that they had a grand time," the article said. "'They were safe, they were warm,' [Maffei] said."

Maffei appeared in court for an arraignment on .

"My children have been put back in a place where they were abused," he said in the court room.

According to the Chronicle, "their mother, Jennifer Hipon, 37, has said such claims are unfounded and noted that Maffei never reported his allegations to authorities."

The saga began Sept. 4 when Maffei allegedly abducted his two children, ages 2 and 3, at about 3 p.m. from their home on the 100 block of James Court in South San Francisco and then drove in a rental car to Alameda where he allegedly stole a boat and set shore with the kids, police said.

The yacht was spotted about 50 miles off the coast from Pillar Point Harbor in Half Moon Bay early Friday by a commercial fisherman who notified the U.S. Coast Guard.

Coast Guard officials sent crews by air and by sea to find the yacht and eventually safe on board the vessel.

According to court records, Hipon filed a domestic violence restraining order against him last week. A hearing for that is Friday, Sept. 21.

Maffei is currently in custody in lieu of a $500,000 bail, and he is set to enter a plea on Monday. He faces eight felony counts.

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.