.
Feedback

UPDATE: Half Moon Bay Gas Station Shooting Suspect In Court

Pretrial conference scheduled Monday afternoon for attempted murder suspect Brandon Michael Sargentini in San Mateo County Superior Court was postponed.

Update 3/9: According to District Attorney Stephen (Steve) Wagstaffe, Sargentini's attorney was not available to appear in court on Monday for the scheduled pretrial conference, so the conference was postponed until March 15. Sargentini's jury trial is still on the docket for April 4 at 8:45 a.m. at the San Mateo County Superior Court in Redwood City.

A San Jose man suspected of opening fire on a Half Moon Bay resident last July at a local gas station is scheduled for a pretrial conference in San Mateo County Superior Court Monday afternoon.

Defendant Brandon Michael Sargentini, whose case will be heard by a jury on April 4, is facing multiple charges, including one of attempted murder.

Sargentini was with San Leandro resident Samantha Nicole Warner at the gas station at the corner of Highway 1 and Highway 92 when the shooting victim (identified by the as Half Moon Bay resident Vito Valdez) spoke to Warner. Sargentini reportedly then said to the victim "If you want to talk to her, you got to pay me." The victim reportedly ignored Sargentini. According to the Office of San Mateo County District Attorney Stephen Wagstaffe, Sargentini allegedly then executed a series of actions by punching the victim in the face, drawing a revolver, threatening to kill the victim, and then shooting the victim in the forearm after the victim reportedly raised his arm in self-defense.

According to the District Attorney's Office, Warner drove Sargentini away from the scene and the pair was arrested in Alameda County on July 19, one day after the shooting. A gun was found in the vehicle occupied by Sargentini and Warner.

Sargentini is currently in custody. On Aug. 4, Warner was given a sentence of 60 days in county jail and 3 years probation after pleading nolo contendere -- otherwise known as a "no contest" plea -- to a charge of being an accessory to a felony, according to the District Attorney's Office. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?