.
Feedback

San Mateo County Gang Task Force Reports Increase in Searches, Seizures

2009 - 2010 data of arrests, searches, field contacts, weapons and drug seizures released for first time by county Sheriff's Office.

While the total number of gang member arrests decreased, an increased number of searches and seizures took place in 2010 compared to the year before, according to never-before released data from the San Mateo County Gang Task Force to Half Moon Bay Patch.

Staffed by an ever-rotating group of Sheriff's deputies and police officers from across San Mateo County, the Gang Task Force is under the jurisdiction of the Gang Intelligence Unit of the Sheriff's Office. The charge of the Task Force is to keep a lid on gang activity in the county by monitoring identified hot spots and checking in on gang members, affiliates and associates on probation or parole, according to San Mateo County Sheriff's Office Sgt. Leo Capovilla, head of the Gang Task Force and the Gang Intelligence Unit.

The Gang Task Force was created in 2005 as a way to address the challenges cities were having with gangs at the time, Capovilla said.

"The problems that we had in 2005 were that gangs crossed city boundaries, but as law enforcement, we had city boundaries," said Capovilla.

"San Mateo County's model is unique, because we collaborate and work together across the county," he said.

According to Capovilla, the county is looked to as a model across the Bay Area for the way cities work together to share information as part of its Gang Task Force and Narcotics Task Force, as well as for pooling resources.

Each city contributes a proportional number of staff and funding to the Gang Task Force based on the size of the city. Eight cars with three to four officers in each car are deployed at one time with each unit taking on a different assignment at various locations across San Mateo County, said Capovilla.

"That's why a resident of Half Moon Bay may see a Hillsborough police car on their streets," Capovilla said.

One of the Sheriff's deputies who works as part of the Gang Task Force is Alfredo Gudino, a school resource officer who is part of the agency's school policing unit.

Gudino and other members of the Gang Task Force have patrolled identified hotspots in Half Moon Bay, especially in the wake of two last year between rival Norteño and Sureño street gangs, according to Lt. Lisa Williams, head of the Sheriff's Office substation in Half Moon Bay. Both gangs have strongholds in Half Moon Bay.

For 16 weeks of the year — centering around the summer months — the Task Force operates full time. During the rest of the year, it operates for four days each month. The specific days of the month are not announced to the public beforehand.

During a shift, units will search every person on parole or probation identified by the county's Gang Intelligence Unit as someone who is a gang member, gang affiliate or gang associate, according to Capovilla.

"We're going to knock on their door and search them," Capovilla said. "Then we'll send reports to their parole officer and tell them how they're doing."

Standard conditions for those on parole and probation are not being allowed to drink alcohol, carry weapons, spend time in "high violence" areas or hang out with other gang members, Capovilla said. Specific conditions vary depending on the crime associated with each individual, according to Capovilla.

Weapons and drugs seizures increased by the Gang Task Force from 2009 to 2010, according to data released to Patch exclusively thus far by the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office (see table below).

One statistic Capovilla pointed out was the increase in seized firearms, which more than doubled from 2009 (15) to 2010 (34).

Over 1900 grams of drugs were seized in 2010, compared to over 1600 grams the year before. While marijuana was the most common drug seized by far in 2009 and 2010, cocaine was the second-most seized drug in 2009, followed by methamphetamines. In 2010, the amount of seized cocaine decreased dramatically while seized methamphetamines increased to the second-most commonly seized drug that year.

In 2010, the total number of searches increased from over 2800 to close to 4700 compared to the year before.

The total number of contacts made in the field — comprised of individuals identified to be gang members (or gang affiliates and associates) as well as non-gang members — increased by over 1600 from 6640 contacts in 2009 to 8300 in 2010.

While arrests were were down for juveniles from 2009 to 2010, adult arrests were slightly elevated for the same period. Total arrests decreased from 531 in 2009 to 494 the following year, however.

San Mateo County Gang Task Force Deployment Statistics, 2009 - 2010

YEAR                               

 2009  

2010

ARRESTS 429 346 Adult 102 148 Juvenile 531 494 TOTAL ARRESTS 531 494


ADMINISTRATIVE SEARCHES

Parole 156 210 Probation 271 207 Arrest Warrant 8 6 Prepared Searches/Warrants Sent 435 423 TOTAL PREPARED SEARCHES COMPLETED 284 363


ON-VIEW SEARCHES

Parole 424 617 Probation 745 1344 Consent 1385 2373 TOTAL ON-VIEW SEARCHES COMPLETED 2554 4334


FIELD CONTACTS

1* On-View Field Contacts (Non-Gang) 5833 6425 2 *On-View Field Contacts (Gang) 807 1875  -New Gang Validations 233 390  -Field Identifications (FI's) 1795 2569 TOTAL ON-VIEW FIELD CONTACTS (*1+2*) 6640 8300


SEIZURES

Firearms 15 34 Other Weapons 24 32 TOTAL WEAPONS 39 66 Heroin (Grams) 39.34 22.1 Cocaine (Grams) 247.82 64.43 Methamphetamines (Grams) 149.6 202.11 MDMA-Ecstasy (2009 Grams/2010 Pills) 199.76 88 Marijuana (Grams) 1015.16 1527.18 TOTAL DRUGS 1651.68 1903.82

                             Source: Gang Task Force, San Mateo County Sheriff's Office

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
George Muteff May 15, 2013 at 06:52 pm
I'm not particularly thrilled with yet another big corporate fast food store in HMB. I'm not a realRead More Taco Bell fan either, but I have noticed that Taco Bell and KFC are one in the same at many locations. I'm wondering if that will be the case here. Will this store include KFC? Anyone know?
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
pae May 13, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Most dogs and horses can get along fine, if they have the opportunity to be socialized to eachRead More other. If dogs never get to see horses, or vice versa, then there is a startle/fear response, and each will respond according to its temperament. Remove all opportunities for this socialization, as GGNRA wants to do, and there will be more problems. Apparently GGNRA has even ordered stable owners not to allow equestrians to bring their dogs to the stable any more, which is grossly unfair to all concerned. GGNRA just hates dogs, and their policies have been written accordingly. It is unfathomable that here on the Coastside, surrounded by miles of open space, there is no legal area except one small dog park, for dog owners to walk with their companions off leash. Horses, bicycles and people have full access, but dog owners very limited access, and no access for off leash exercising. Rancho territory is 6 1/2 square miles. Surely there is enough room for all recreation! It's our tax money, too, but we're being denied use of the space we own.