.
Feedback

Lawn Be Gone: City Seeks to Save Money, Conserve Water

Half Moon Bay estimates over $12,000 can be saved annually by replacing lawns with drought-resistant plants, mulch and hardscapes such as decomposed granite.

In an effort to save money and water, the Half Moon Bay City Council will hold a special study session tonight on the topic of replacing a portion of its lawns with drought-tolerant plants, mulch, gravel pathways and hardscapes such as decomposed granite. 

According to the city, installing such lawn alternatives can save over $12,000 a year by reducing costs on water delivery, water usage and maintenance. Currently, the city spends about $16,000 for water charges at city parks alone and estimates that these costs can be cut in half by installing drought-tolerant plants or hardscapes in place of lawns.

These actions would also cut back on pesticide use and the release of such chemicals to the water table, the city says.

Staff is asking councilmembers to consider their suggestions as candidates for lawn reduction and replacement at the locations listed below. Suggestions submitted in a city staff report by Larry Carnahan, Public Works Superintendent, are in quotes.

  • - "Turf area is underutilized  and can be removed and replaced with decomposed granite. We may also enhance this area with some additional low-water use plants."
  • - "The grass area covers approximately 11,500 sq. feet. Approximately 95% of the turf is proposed for removal. Some of the grass would be replaced with picnic tables, barbeques and decomposed granite. This park would be the largest area of reduction."
  • - "Has a small turf area that is underutilized and could be removed and replaced by expanding the playground area and adding drought-tolerant plants and perhaps adding a third picnic table." Carnahan also recommends increasing the playground area as a way to terrace the area which he says would enable the city to confirm to new discharge permit standards mandating that rain and runoff water be contained on city property.
  • - "A portion of the turf area could be removed and replaced with additional picnic tables, barbeques and decomposed granite. This would allow more people to utilize the area for picnics and family gatherings. With the additional facilities, the park would be more usable and not as full or crowded."
  • Lawn at the - "Totally passive and its main purpose is for aesthetics. All the existing turf can be removed and be replaced with gravel pathways, low maintenance and drought-tolerant plants and mulch. This area can be developed into a small park-like area with seating and tables which we believe would enhance or encourage public use."

The city says it could offset some of the initial costs to remove and replace the lawns with the "Lawn Be Gone" rebate program offered by the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency.  The program runs through June 2012 and offers a maximum of 50 cents per square foot and $3,000 in materials towards replacing a lawn with drought-tolerant plants.

To read the city staff report, click on the PDF document in the media box to the right.

The study session will be held tonight at 6:15 p.m. at the Ted Adcock Senior/Community Center (535 Kelly Ave.).

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.