.
Feedback

City Council Receives Ethics Training, Adopts Code of Responsible Practices

Half Moon Bay leaders discuss ethical duties required of public officials.

 

Half Moon Bay city leaders participated in a government-mandated training Tuesday evening focused on the ethical duties required of public officials.

The 2.5 hour training was held in an effort to comply with state law AB1234, which expects elected and appointed officials to receive at least two hours of ethics training every two years.

“Public servants are just that,” said Caio Arellano, attorney with Santa Cruz firm Atchinson, Barisone, Condotti & Kovacevich. “They should not receive benefits by virtue of the fact they hold these positions.”

City Attorney Tony Condotti along with Arellano gave the presentation that covered such topics as fair process, personal financial gain, personal advantages and perks as well as open government.

The attorneys said that while law present distinct rules and regulations, ethics may take more thought.

“They reflect really the floor of ethical decision making in government,” Condotti said of laws as opposed to ethics.

A good rule of thumb, Condotti said, is for officials to ask themselves if they’d like to see their actions in the headlines.

Councilmembers questioned some ethics that often presented fine lines.

Councilmember Rick Kowalcyzk voiced some confusion with the idea that public officials should always be impartial and avoid favoritism.

“I can envision a myriad of situations in which you might have an opinion,” he said.

Condotti said if questions arise it is best to consult the city attorney or the California Fair Political Practices Commission.

In keeping with the ethics discussed, councilmembers signed the city's first-ever .

The two-page code, developed by city staff earlier this year, will act as a framework to guide the conduct of Half Moon Bay's public officials. Elected officials will now be required to sign the code upon taking office.

Youth Summit Report Back

Earlier in the evening, local students who participated in the in Half Moon Bay spoke of their experiences at the event aimed at providing an outlet for youth to discuss their age specific issues.

“When we presented this to the community they really stepped forward and they came out,” said San Mateo County Sheriff's Deputy Mike Smyser.

Approximately 140 students took part in the summit's workshops in order to develop solutions to concerns such as , cyber , teen health and technology and innovation.

“Supporting big companies is not always a good idea because big companies have big bureacrats,” said eighth grader Matthew Dupree. 

Dupree took part in an entrepreneurial workshop in which students discussed the need for education and support in terms of technology and innovation.

The students, Dupree said, suggested that the city allocate property to allow local start-ups to rent the space.

Councilmember Naomi Patridge, who attended a session with former gang member and motivational speaker Willie Stokes, commended coordinators for their choice of high quality speakers.

“He was a dynamic speaker and held the attention of the kids,” Patridge said of Stokes. “He would be really good to come back next year.”

Deputy Smyser said they would continue bringing in powerful speakers and was optimistic that Stokes would return for the summit next year.

Mayor Allan Alifano said he hoped the summit would continue to thrive for the benefit of local students.

“I hope we can double the amount of kids next year,” he said.

Got Patch? Sign up for our newsletter by clicking on the "Patch Newsletter" link on the top right of our homepage.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?