.
Feedback

County Voters Will Pick Next Supervisor Election System

San Mateo County Board of Supervisors empowers voters to choose between "by district" or "at large" elections.

San Mateo County residents will have the opportunity this fall to choose which election system they prefer for selecting candidates to the county board of supervisors.

Under a unanimous decision by the county board of supervisors Tuesday morning, a ballot measure will allow voters to choose whether to move to a "by district" election system, which would empower residents within regional boundaries to select which candidate will represent each county district.


San Mateo County is the only county in the state that currently allows supervisors to be selected by an "at large" system, in which candidates that receive the most county-wide votes are elected.

In 2010, the board shot down the idea of floating a ballot measure that empowered voters to select the county election system.

But a lawsuit filed last August by the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area challenged the board's decision, and claimed that county leadership is marginalizing the Asian and Latino voting populations by continuing to use the "at large" system.

The lawsuit cites that nearly half the county's residents are either Asian or Latino, yet neither group is represented on the county Board of Supervisors.

Opponents of the "at large" system believe that supervisors elected by district are more likely to better represent the residents of that region, which could empower members of groups that have historically been under represented in government.

At the meeting Tuesday morning in Redwood City, most supervisors defended the status quo but acknowledged a willingness to allow voters to choose which system they prefer.

"I'm not opposed to putting it on the November ballot, but I still believe this is the best opportunity for representation of all county residents," said Supervisor Rose Jacobs Gibson, who will leave her seat on the board in the coming election.

Those who defend the "at large" system believe that it encourages supervisors to  be informed on county-wide issues, rather than only those that impact the district that they represent.

Supervisor Carole Groom expressed many of those same sentiments, but ultimately decided it would be best to allow the residents to decide.

"Let's put it on the ballot and lets ask the voters what their vision is," she said.

Voters have twice in the past chosen to stick with the "at large" system, in 1978 and again in 1980.

Supervisor Don Horsley, who also favors the "at large" system, agreed that voters should once again have the opportunity to choose.

"It is the right of the people to decide how they are governed," he said.

The proposed measure will come back to the board for a final approval in July, before ballot language is agreed upon and sent on to the county election officials for certification to go on the November 2012 election ballot.

Got Patch? Sign up for our newsletter by clicking on the "Patch Newsletter" link on the top right of our homepage.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.