.
Feedback

Court Dismisses Schools' Suit Against County for Lehman Collapse

County schools and other public agencies lost roughly $155 million in investments when Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008.

 A state appeals court on Thursday approved the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by a dozen local school districts against San Mateo County and its Treasurer over financial losses suffered when Lehman Brothers collapsed.

According to the ruling, such investment decisions are "discretionary activity, which should not be the subject of scrutiny and second-guessing."

A long list of Peninsula and Coastside school districts sued the County and then-Treasurer Lee Buffington over approximately $20 million in investment losses that followed the bankruptcy of the investment bank Lehman Brothers in September of 2008. The funds were required by law to be invested in a pool managed by the County Treasurer.

Overall, public agencies in San Mateo County collectively lost $155 million in Lehman investments. This included the 12 local school districts, as well as the County itself, several Cities, and numerous special districts.

In its ruling, the appeals court in San Francisco said that a Treasurer’s "decisions as a public servant investor bear the hallmarks of discretionary activity, which should not be the subject of scrutiny and second-guessing by a coordinate branch of government."

Stuart Gasner, an attorney with Keker & Van Nest, a San Francisco law firm that represents the County and the Treasurer, said in a statement Thursday, "We are pleased with the decision and that a three-judge panel essentially came to the conclusion that we have argued all along - the Treasurer cannot be sued for making complex investment decisions or for failing to predict Lehman’s collapse."

"What’s important to remember is that Lehman’s collapse came shortly after company executives reassured investors that the company was sound," Gasner added.

The court’s decision will allow County officials to focus on a separate suit filed in federal court in New York that seeks to hold Lehman executives personally accountable for defrauding investors.

Read the full Court Ruling.

The lawsuit was brought by the following local school districts:

  • San Mateo Union High School District
  • Menlo Park City Elementary School District
  • San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools
  • Belmont-Redwood Shores Elementary School District
  • Cabrillo Unified School District
  • Burlingame Elementary School District
  • Jefferson Elementary School District
  • Ravenswood City School District
  • San Bruno Park Elementary School District
  • San Carlos Elementary School District
  • Los Lomitas Elementary School District
  • Portola Valley Elementary School District
  • Woodside Elementary School District

What do you think of the court's decision? Do you think the County Treasurer should be held accountable for how he decided to invest $155 million in our taxpayer money? Or was the collapse of Lehman Bros. unpredictable, therefore meaning Buffington's decision should be let go? Do you agree that County Treasurers' investment decisions should be 'above scrutiny?' Tell us your thoughts in the comments below.

Editor's Note: Former San Mateo County Treasurer Lee Buffington passed away in December of 2011.

Keep up with local news — follow Patch


Sign up for Half Moon Bay Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter


Want to share your opinions with the communities of the Coastside? Start your
own blog here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.