.
Feedback

UPDATE: Effort to Block Wavecrest from Off-Roaders Violated Coastal Act, Resident Alleges

Logs placed on Redondo Beach Rd in Half Moon Bay as emergency measure, county says.

Update 5/8 8:03 a.m.: San Mateo County Parks Superintendent Scott Lombardi tells Half Moon Bay Patch that the logs at Redondo Beach Road will be removed today.

Update 12:38 p.m.: Assistant County Manager David Holland told Half Moon Bay Patch that the logs at Redondo Beach Road will be removed on May 8 or 9.

In the wake of a four-wheel drive off-roading incident on March 18 and 19 at Wavecrest — which resulted in the disruption of protected land in south Half Moon Bay — San Mateo County Parks placed logs at three locations on Redondo Beach Road to block further access to the area.

Yet one Half Moon Bay resident is publicly disputing the legality of the action, saying that the logs should only have been placed with a Coastal Development Permit in hand first.

According to Parks Superintendent Scott Lombardi, his agency placed the logs on March 27.

“After the off-roading incident took place, Jo Chamberlain at the called me to see if we could block access with logs,” Assistant San Mateo County Manager David Holland said, who in turn contacted the county’s parks department.

That action was taken as an emergency measure to prevent further damage being done by additional off-road vehicles in an environmentally sensitive habitat home to frogs, the , and endangered plants, said Holland.

“It’s a waste of taxpayer money,” says Redondo Beach Road resident , who filed a complaint with the for the action on April 6. Muteff says that because the logs were set in place without a Coastal Development Permit, the action violated the California Coastal Act.

“These are people who pay no taxes, yet they use our money to protect their assets,” Muteff said.

The Half Moon Bay resident says he is referring to the Half Moon Bay-based Coastside Land Trust and Palo Alto's — two groups that own portions of Wavecrest in the vicinity of the off-roading incident, along with hundreds of individuals who own 25 ft. by 100 ft. plots of land.

Both groups say they were not involved in laying down the logs. POST spokesperson Nina Nowak declined to comment any further about the matter.

Muteff disputes both groups, saying that he witnessed representatives from POST and CLT inspecting the damage at the location of the off-roading incident in March.

Chamberlain says that she did not know whether the logs were placed after calling Holland. According to her, no one at the county contacted her about whether the request was implemented.

Sending Coastside Land Trust staff out to the scene of the incident was to protect the organization’s property, she said.

“It would be irresponsible for CLT and POST not to follow up on our own property and not to immediately follow up on a report of habitat damage,“ she said.

Holland says the placement of the logs was not illegal.

“In an emergency situation, we can put some structures in to prevent additional damages — as long as we remove them after 45 days or get a Coastal Development Permit after the fact,” he said.

The logs will likely be removed today or tomorrow, Holland said.

With a penalty of just $30 for vehicles running off-road illegally, additional incidents are sure to take place at Wavecrest each rainy season unless a long-term solution is implemented, Holland said.

Last year, the county also blocked access from vehicles by placing logs down at Wavecrest in February 2011 after another off-roading incident took place.

“The only long-term answer is to run a fence all the way down Redondo Beach Road,” Holland said.

Chamberlain said that her organization is focusing on how much it will cost to repair the damage done to the land by the off-roaders.

“We can’t do it now because the California red-legged frog and the tree frog have laid their eggs,” she said.

City officials did not respond to a request for comment on the incident.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?