.
Feedback

MCC Agenda for Wednesday, May 9, 2012 at Seton at 7:30 p.m.

 ,   Add to calendar
 600 Marine Blvd Moss Beach CA 94038  See map

Highlights of the agenda for the regular MCC meeting next Wednesday, May 9, 2012 from 7:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m at Seton Medical Center Coastside, Marine Boulevard & Etheldore, Moss Beach.


Directions: (Take Highway 1 to Marine Boulevard and follow hospital signs uphill)
MCC attendees must park in upper parking lot (first left near top of hill) per hospital policy.

The Council will be discussing and may take action on the following Regular Agenda Items: 

a. Montara 7th St Follow-up Letter – Kehoe (8:00) (30 minutes) Review cover letter updating and resend original letter (Mar. 9, 2011) to County and Supervisor noting no action and recent public comments.
Desired Outcome: Approve the cover letter and resend with original letter.

b. Midcoast Industrial Zoning – Ketcham (8:30) (20 minutes) Follow-up on 4/25/12 MCC presentation on zoning updates needed for Midcoast M-1 and Princeton Waterfront Districts – correspondence from County Planning Dept.
Desired Outcome: Reassess need for MCC letter at this time.

c. MCC representation on C/CAG Airport Land Use Committee (ALUC) -- (Ketcham) (8:50) (20 minutes) Review and approve MCC letter to C/CAG (City/County Association of Governments) requesting a position be created on ALUC for an elected MCC member and alternate.
Desired Outcome: Approve the letter.

d. Midcoast Park Lands (MPL) Designee – (Stein) (9:20) (20 minutes) Update our appointed Midcoast Community Council Designee to the Board of Directors of MPL.
Desired Outcome: Council will vote and approve their Midcoast Park Lands Designee.

Supporting documents can be found on the MCC website:
http://mcc.sanmateo.org/mcchome.html

To receive agendas via email, subscribe to the Google Group “MCC-Agendas” here:
http://groups.google.com/group/mcc-agendas?hl=en

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?