.
Feedback

Gary Riddell, Officer to be Recalled

"My No. 1 priority is to ensure we are receiving the services we are paying for; if CalFire had those same priorities this contract would have worked but they do not."

How much more or less will a stand-alone Coastside department cost the community? 

In short, starting a local fire department will not cost the tax payers any additional money. In fact the Fire District has several opportunities to regain millions spent on the transition moving to CalFire and use those millions for costs incurred with starting our own Fire Service.

How is the level of service of CalFire better or worse than the level of service of a stand-alone Coastside department?

There are many advantages to a local fire department, and the most important is local control over the level of service. Right now, we contract with CalFire for services, but if they violate the terms of that contract we have no recourse. So, when CalFire takes our experienced firefighters and replaces them with inexperienced ones, or when they refuse to hire a Fire Marshall in the District despite the fact that it puts our community’s safety at risk, we have no recourse. The Fire Board will have local firefighters trained to the standards that meet the needs of the Coastside residents. Why should we let the vendor that has failed to provide contracted Fire Services to our residents also be in charge of monitoring those services? We need to assert local control because CalFire has failed to do their job.

Why Vote Yes or No on the Recall?

Vote no. This recall is a blatant power grab by CalFire in retaliation for our locally elected officials doing their job. When the Board was elected they tried to get CalFire to provide the service levels specified in the mutually agreed contract and owed the residents of the Coastside. When they refused to do that, the Board decided that it was in the best interest of the District not to renew the contract. Now, CalFire's union is sponsoring a recall election so that they can stack the Board with outsiders that answer to them. Why should the residents of the Coastside give control of our Board to the vendor that failed to provide the services we need. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?