.
Feedback

Half Moon Bay Planning Director to Leave Friday; City Replaces Position with Interim Employee

Conditions of Steve Flint's departure unknown.

After working for nearly seven years as the Planning Director for the city of Half Moon Bay, Steve Flint will leave the job on Friday, according to City Manager Laura Snideman.

Flint will be replaced by Interim Planning Director Pat Webb, who was hired as an part-time temporary employee earlier this month. According to Snideman, Webb has worked as a planner in several cities throughout the Peninsula, and on several projects in San Mateo County including the downtown revitalization of Redwood City.

"I'm really excited someone of her caliber and experience has agreed to help us," Snideman said on Tuesday.

Webb's contract with the city began on March 19 and will end no later than July 1. Working 30 hours per week, Webb will be responsible for conducting an organizational analysis of the city planning department and for planning the transition to a permanent director. She will receive $66.85 an hour in compensation. 

Flint's departure comes approximately five weeks after what Snideman described as an "active personnel matter" arose between the planning director and the city. As Flint and city officials have not commented on the matter, the exact nature of the situation is unknown.

In the week before Feb. 20, Snideman allegedly asked Flint for his resignation, according to the Half Moon Bay Review. Snideman nor Flint did not confirm or deny the matter.

In response, many of Flint's colleagues and fellow Half Moon Bay residents at a Feb. 21 city council meeting.

Flint did not not comment on the situation, but his wife Kendall did say that Flint was in discussions with the city in order to resolve the matter. City officials met in closed session to discuss Flint's case over the following weeks.

Locals have speculated that the matter had something to do with settling the Kehoe Ditch lawsuit filed against Half Moon Bay by resident Jimmy Benjamin. The lawsuit resulted in what could be over $1 million in fines against the city for not obtaining a Coastal Development Permit back in 2009 when it hired the California Conservation Corps to clear the area classified as endangered species habitat. Flint was the city's planning director at the time.

Benjamin told the Half Moon Bay Review that he had not pursued a settlement which included Flint's departure as one of the conditions.

Neither Flint nor Snideman commented on the outcome of the discussions between Flint and the city now that his departure has been confirmed.

To see a copy of Webb's contract with the city, click on the PDF document to the media box at right.

Got Patch? Sign up for our newsletter by clicking on the "Patch Newsletter" link on the top right of our homepage.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?