.
Feedback

Harbor Commission to Evaluate Use of Pillar Point as Public Venue and More

Report of July 20 Harbor District Commissioner Meeting.

The San Mateo County Harbor District Board of Harbor Commissioners met Wednesday to define the payment of Passenger Service Fees, discuss hosting events at county harbors and approve a Capital Improvement Program for Oyster Point Marina.

The board met with Commissioner Sally Campbell absent.

Tom Mattusch, captain of the Half Moon Bay Huli Cat Sport and Fishing Charter Boat, addressed the board regarding his request to pay Passenger Service Fees on an annual basis rather than monthly.

“Cash flow is extremely difficult in this business,” he said. “The payment history will show I pay once a year.”

Mattusch said he was only requesting to formally validate a payment method he has used many times in the past.

“All I’ve been trying to do is legitimize what I’ve been doing for years,” he said. Mattusch said that the idea of any fiscal impact this will take on the Harbor District is “ludicrous.”

Passenger Service Fees are based upon actual passengers who have taken trips on a vessel, and Mattusch noted that his are much higher than the average boat at Pill Point.

Harbor District General Manager Peter Grenell said though allowing one request to pay annually may not take a large toll on the finances for the harbor, more people will likely ask for the same request.

“It’s quite possible, and I would say it’s likely, most anyone else is going to ask for the same consideration,” Grenell said. “Then the amount of money that you’re not going to be making is going to increase considerably.”

Grenell also mentioned that although Mattusch’s annual payment of Passenger Service Fees has gone unnoticed, Mattusch is still not complying with his permit.

“There’s no reason to make an exception in this case,” Grenell said.

The commissioners unanimously approved to deny Mattusch the ability to pay Passenger Service Fees on an annual basis.

The commissioners began a discussion of using Oyster Point Marina and Pillar Point Harbor as venues for public events.

More than 50 events have taken place in the harbors in the last two years. Most took place at Pillar Point, ranging from weddings to surf contests.

Grenell suggested that the Harbor District should adopt a policy of such events citing environmental impacts and public safety concerns among the issues that should be addressed.

“Some experiences have been very special and some experiences have been very stressful,” said Harbor Commission President Pietro Parravano.

The Harbor District received $21,155 last year from special events, but the majority of the revenue originated from the .

The board was presented with 11 questions that would function as guidelines for the new policy.

Grenell commented that the Harbor District should evaluate of how they are different from parks and recreation policies and if a district policy or community policy should be adopted.

“We’re going to start crafting the bones of policy,” Grenell said.

No action was taken.

The board unanimously approved the implementation of a five-year Capital Improvement Program to increase berthing occupancy and revenue at Oyster Point Marina.

“We make reference to the potential as it may be for promoting and there by attracting new customs to the American Cup events,” Grenell said.

The funds would be given to the Harbor District from South San Francisco after approval of the city manager and the city council.

“It would be crazy not to support it,” said Commissioner Leo Paderdii.

Harbor Master Robert Johnson proposed the authorization of workers’ compensation coverage for the Pillar Point Harbor Waste Oil Tank Removal Project.

Johnson described the failure to provide workers’ compensation as a lapse.

“It was an oversight in developing the contract documents that any time you work over the water you need United States Longshore and Harborworkers’ workers’ compensation coverage,” Johnson said.

The board unanimously approved the cost to cover workers’ compensation not to exceed $3, 114.

The next scheduled Harbor Commissioners meeting will be held August 4 at the Comfort Inn in Half Moon Bay.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
pae May 13, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Most dogs and horses can get along fine, if they have the opportunity to be socialized to eachRead More other. If dogs never get to see horses, or vice versa, then there is a startle/fear response, and each will respond according to its temperament. Remove all opportunities for this socialization, as GGNRA wants to do, and there will be more problems. Apparently GGNRA has even ordered stable owners not to allow equestrians to bring their dogs to the stable any more, which is grossly unfair to all concerned. GGNRA just hates dogs, and their policies have been written accordingly. It is unfathomable that here on the Coastside, surrounded by miles of open space, there is no legal area except one small dog park, for dog owners to walk with their companions off leash. Horses, bicycles and people have full access, but dog owners very limited access, and no access for off leash exercising. Rancho territory is 6 1/2 square miles. Surely there is enough room for all recreation! It's our tax money, too, but we're being denied use of the space we own.