.
Feedback

Is Transitional Kindergarten Really That Hard to Fund?

State Senator Joe Simitian, who authored the law requiring TK in California, says it shouldn't be as hard to fund it as school districts are making it out to be.

It's no secret the state of California is in financial crisis — and that one of the areas being hit the hardest is education.

For that reason, though many support the idea behind the Kindergarten Readiness Act and its subsequent mandate that all schools offer Transitional Kindergarten (TK) for children born late in the year, they also say, it's hard to support the idea for financial reasons.

In other words, some say, the people of California just can't support a state mandate to start offering a new program that costs additional money that just isn't there.

So, Patch decided to go directly to the man — California State Sen. Joe Simitian, who authored SB 1381, otherwise known as the Kindergarten Readiness Act, changing the minimum age requirements so that all children must turn 5 years old by Sept. 1 in order to start kindergarten that year, and mandating that all schools in the state offer TK for students that otherwise would have been old enough to start kindergarten, having a birthday that falls between Sept. 2 and Dec. 2.

Patch had a conversation with Simitian recently and asked him this very question: What do you think about the fact that many school districts throughout the state say they can't afford to offer TK, to the extent that some are saying they refuse to offer it until the state provides the money to pay for it?

In a nutshell, Simitian said, those school districts are confused, and that offering TK should not cost them a penny more than it does to offer kindergarten right now.

Simitian: 'The money is there'
Simitian explained, the money for kindergarten and TK is part of what is known in the legislation as "Continuous Appropriations." That means, each year, the money to keep schools open is not something that is subject to a vote or a budget, it is automatically earmarked for California schools. 

"The funding is there," he said. "It is not something the Governor can remove from the budget."

Furthermore, Simitian said, the school districts that say they can't afford to start offering TK are confused about the idea behind the law and how it's supposed to be carried out.

In a nutshell, it's a matter of shuffling around the school's current resources, not paying for additional resources, to carry out offering TK.

By changing the law and declaring that all students must be 5 by Sept. 1 in order to start kindergarten, Simitian said, schools will basically see their kindergarten class sizes drop.

Simitian said, a lot of how a district looks at TK depends on whether the district is "basic aid" — meaning, funded through local property taxes - or "revenue-limit" — meaning, funded by the state based by the number of students enrolled.

Simitian explained, it behooves revenue-limit districts to offer TK because it would replace the students the district will lose to the new age requirement with TK students, so they keep their per-student funding. 

Likewise, Simitian said, offering TK should not adversely affect a basic aid district's budget, since they are funded by property taxes and not the number of students. Again, Simitian reiterated, it's about shuffling around a school's kindergarten resources, not paying for additional resources.

Therefore, for example, if a school currently has five kindergarten classrooms in order to serve the number of students enrolled in kindergarten each year by the old age requirement, the school now might only need four classrooms. That fifth classroom could then be transformed into a TK classroom.

In other words, Simitian said, "There should be no additional costs, and no additional classrooms needed [in order for that school to offer TK]," he said. "You're still serving the same number of kids, just now, a certain number of them will be in a TK classroom instead of a kindergarten classroom."

When you look at it that way, it becomes hard to understand why so many districts are claiming they can't offer TK, he added.

Patch then asked Simitian, why are so many districts out there confused over how to make TK work in their schools?

Simitian responded, "I don't know. There's a lot of confusion out there. Although, the school districts should have a more refined understanding of this than the average person."

"School districts up and down the state should know about this by now," he continued. "Any school that chooses to provide TK will be fully funded."


What about the Governor?

Many officials from school districts across the state are still biting their nails, waiting to find out just how much Gov. Jerry Brown is going to take away from schools as he desperately tries to balance the state budget.

Earlier this year, Simitian said the Governor tried to pass a state budget that did away with TK - meaning, he wanted to keep the $700 million in savings statewide that would come from not allowing children who don't meet the new kindergarten age requirement to enroll in school and use it to pay for other state needs. Simitian said, the governor's thinking was, by keeping the age requirement but making TK optional, many schools would opt out, saying they can't afford to offer it.

Thankfully, Simitian said, the state legislature rejected Gov. Brown's proposal by a 3-1 vote.

"So, TK remains the law, and the funding is still in place," he said, adding that any school district that does not have a TK program in place come the first day of the 2012-13 school year in the fall will be in violation of state law.

Simitian said, when he authored the Kindergarten Readiness Act and fought for it to be passed, he never intended to leave California schools squandering to afford to offer something that he, in essence, made mandatory.

"That would mean parents [of children with late-year birthdays] would have to fend for themselves, and that makes me heartbroken," he said.


What does this mean for the Cabrillo Unified School District?

The Cabrillo Unified School District is planning to establish a Transitional Kindergarten for the 2012-2013 school year, which will be offered at one of the District's elementary schools, to be determined shortly, based upon enrollment of students, according to Elizabeth Schuck, assistant superintendent. Registration for the Cabrillo District TK opened Jan. 17, 2012.

For more information, a San Mateo County Office of Education report to Cabrillo Unified School District Board from Aug. 8, 2011, about Transitional Kindergarten is attached to this article. For further questions, call Schuck at (650) 712-7107.


For more information on the Kindergarten Readiness Act (SB 1381), visit the California Department of Education's website.

Got Patch? Sign up for our newsletter by clicking on the "Patch Newsletter" link on the top right of our homepage.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
pae May 13, 2013 at 03:00 pm
Most dogs and horses can get along fine, if they have the opportunity to be socialized to eachRead More other. If dogs never get to see horses, or vice versa, then there is a startle/fear response, and each will respond according to its temperament. Remove all opportunities for this socialization, as GGNRA wants to do, and there will be more problems. Apparently GGNRA has even ordered stable owners not to allow equestrians to bring their dogs to the stable any more, which is grossly unfair to all concerned. GGNRA just hates dogs, and their policies have been written accordingly. It is unfathomable that here on the Coastside, surrounded by miles of open space, there is no legal area except one small dog park, for dog owners to walk with their companions off leash. Horses, bicycles and people have full access, but dog owners very limited access, and no access for off leash exercising. Rancho territory is 6 1/2 square miles. Surely there is enough room for all recreation! It's our tax money, too, but we're being denied use of the space we own.