.
Feedback

Land's End Seawall May Get Long-Term Approval

Pacifica has several pending permit applications for development required after 2010's severe coastal erosion. Tomorrow this Land's End permit may get long-term state approval.

The California Coastal Commission is scheduled to have a hearing on Friday to decide whether to approve a permit application from Pacifica’s Land's End Associates realtors for seawall development.

The permit would provide a 20-year approval for the 40-foot high seawall at 100 Esplanade Ave that was given only emergency authorization at the time it was built. The original development was in response to severe cliff erosion of 2009 and 2010 El Niño weather conditions.

Bart Willoughby, a local resident who helped acquire development permits for armoring along the buff at Esplanade Ave in recent years, is optimistic about the current state of Pacifica’s coast.

“I have to say that things look fairly decent out here on the Esplanade,” he said. “After seeing this really nice sea wall that was by Land's End, I’m more of the impression that we should, as a long-term solution, build sea walls to connect from Dollar Radio to 320 Esplanade.”

If approved on Friday, the Esplanade seawall development would receive authorization limited to 20 years because environmental changes at the coastline are somewhat unpredictable. The California Coastal Commission would reevaluate the permit again at that time. 

“I think there’s certainly ongoing erosion problems,” said Madeline Cavalieri of the California Coastal Commission. As pertaining to the severe erosion of 2009 and 2010 that required a proclamation of a local emergency, Cavalieri said there are still a couple of development permit applications pending with the Commission, including one for armoring at Dollar Radio on Palmetto Ave.

Another erosion-instigated permit application in the works is for the relocation of a storm drain line from 380 Esplanade to the 500 block. The drain was damaged during erosion in April 2010.

“The intent is to move it as soon as possible,” the city’s engineer, Van Ocampo, said about the drain. City staff have received comments from the California Coastal Commission on the application, and are now working to address them. Ocampo said he anticipates the application will be resubmitted this summer.

On Monday of this week, city council approved the continuation of a proclamation of a local emergency in order for the city to remain eligible for California Emergency Management grants for the drain.

The Land's End Associates application is planned to go to hearing on Friday, unless the applicant requests a postponement.

Land's End Associates was not available for comment at the time of this article.

Got Patch? Sign up for our newsletter by clicking on the "Patch Newsletter" link on the top right of our homepage.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.