.
Feedback

Loma Mar, San Gregorio Post Offices Named On Potential Closure List

Announcement made by US Postal Service earlier today.

Thirteen Bay Area post offices, including five in San Francisco, have been notified they are being eyed for closure, a U.S. Postal Service representative said Tuesday.

The post offices were notified that the Postal Service would begin a pre-proposal stage, which will review every aspect of the site, including community impact, proximity to other post offices and frequency of use, to decide if the individual outlets will be placed under consideration for discontinuation.

A decision on any site will not be made until after December, according to the USPS.

If a site is placed under consideration, it will enter a 60-day proposal period in which the USPS will hold community meetings hear and address customers' concerns.

"We meet them face-to-face, get a feel for the reaction," USPS
spokesman Augustine Ruiz said.

After two 60-day periods, the USPS will make a decision on whether to recommend a site for discontinuation.

There are at least seven Bay Area sites that had been recommended for closure prior to these 13 being announced, including two in Oakland and in San Jose.

Ruiz said she is conscious of the community impact the closures could have.

"By closing a particular post office, we have to make sure we give access (to our services)," Ruiz said.

For this reason, the USPS is setting up Village Post Offices which will provide services similar to those offered by the current offices but at third party locations such as grocery stores or pharmacies.

The San Francisco offices in danger are the Federal Building, Civic Center, Visitation Station (Vistacion Valley), Bayview and McLaren offices. The Byron Rumford and Eastmont stations in Oakland along with the Colonnade station in San Jose also are candidates.

The San Mateo County sites are the Loma Mar, San Gregorio, Colma and Linden post offices. Yountville's Veterans Home post office is Solano County's lone site on the list.

- Bay City News

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Coco May 25, 2013 at 07:03 pm
How biased does one have to be to even hint that Taco Bell will compete with the authentic mexicanRead More food available here in HMB? Anyone eating at Taco Bell surely knows the type of food they are getting, and it is not Mexican! Sad as it is, people still can choose to eat "frankenfood" or "crap in a bag" any time they wish. It will not take any business from the places serving real food. I am wondering if will take as long as the Philly Cheesesteak place did to actually be allowed to open?
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?