.
Feedback

Masur Gets Most Local Votes - But Slocum Wins Supervisor Seat

If the election had been by-district instead of at-large, District 4 tallies would have declared Masur the winner, instead of Slocum.

According to media reports, such as an article in the Daily Journal, as more and more precincts report their final vote counts, tallies are not turning out quite as expected.

For example, in San Mateo County's District 4, though Redwood City resident and former County elections chief Warren Slocum was declared the winner of the Supervisor seat that was up for grabs in the Nov. 6 election, Redwood City School District board member Shelly Masur actually received the most local votes.

It all comes down to a tricky thing called Measure B.

Another matter voters were asked to decide upon Nov. 6 was that of at-large County Supervisor elections versus by-district. Previously, voters have always voted at-large for all seats open in all districts for county supervisors. In other words, someone from Burlingame, for example, could help decide who should be the supervisor representing Redwood City, because of how the system worked.

But, Measure B passed on Nov. 6, which means that, moving forward, County Supervisor elections will be by-district. So, only District 4 residents can vote on who the supervisor representing District 4 will be, in the future.

It's just too bad for Masur that policy wasn't in place already on Nov. 6 - or she could have won.

As the Daily Journal reported Thursday, with results from the County Elections Office's Statement of the Vote, 22,535 voters from District 4 voted for Masur, who was running against Slocum for the District 4 seat. Slocum received 19,317 votes in District 4.

However, it's in the other districts countywide that Slocum prevailed, which pushed his total number of votes over the edge and had him beating Masur overall.

District Four includes Redwood City, Menlo Park and East Palo Alto and the unincorporated areas of North Fair Oaks and Oak Knoll. 

"I feel very gratified to have had so much support in the district. I'm very grateful to the voters for voting for me," Masur told Patch on Thursday. 

As for her thoughts on Measure B, Masur said, "I still support district elections and always have. I'm very glad Measure B passed."

Leading up to the Nov. 6 election, many in Redwood City and San Mateo County expressed their opinions on both sides of Measure B.

Redwood City Councilmember Ian Bain advocated passionately in favor of Measure B, while county resident and voter reform advocate David Cary said he feared Measure B would enable district gerrymandering.

 

PATCH WANTS TO KNOW - What do you think of how the District 4 supervisor election turned out? Do you support at-large supervisor elections, or by-district? Tell us your thoughts in the comments below.

 

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.