.
Feedback

Measure A's Passage Would Bump the County's Sales Tax Up One-Half Cent

Measure A, which would be in effect for 10 years, has the potential to raise as much as $60 million annually for the county's general fund. But would the tax increase negatively impact low-income residents?

A measure to increase San Mateo County's sales tax by one-half cent will go before voters in November.

Measure A, which would be in effect for 10 years, has the potential to raise as much as $60 million annually for the county's general fund, preventing further cuts to parks, emergency dispatch centers, preschool programs, fire prevention and the county's safety net of services for children, families and the poor, according to its supporters.

The measure's passage would bump the county's sales tax from 8.25 percent to 8.75 percent.

Opponents of Measure A, who include Occupy Redwood City, Californians United for a Responsible Budget, and the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association, have called the sales tax increase a "jail tax," insinuating that the revenues raised would pay for building and operating the county's new jail.

"Nothing could be further from the truth," San Mateo County Supervisor Don Horsley said. "This is not a jail tax."

Horsley said Measure A funds would help preserve "the safety net for people who really need help" by bolstering services such as health care for low-income children, transportation for the disabled, emergency room services and library programs for children and teens.

"I don't want to see those services cut," Horsley said.

The Board of Supervisors has already enacted budget cuts to services totaling more than $50 million, eliminated more than 500 county positions and frozen staff salaries since 2008, Horsley said.

Still, diminishing funding from the state and a sluggish economy have left a hole in the county's budget that could jeopardize the well-being of everyone who benefits from county services, he said.

"It's a huge burden and a huge responsibility," Horsley said.

Julia Bott, executive director of the San Mateo County Parks Foundation, agreed.

"Our community needs the funding to be able to maintain the quality of life that we enjoy here in San Mateo County," Bott said.

The county currently has more than $100 million in deferred maintenance projects scattered throughout its park system, according to official tallies.

Measure A funds would be used to pay for some of those projects and prevent the county's vast outdoor spaces from falling into disrepair, Bott said.

"Parks are not a mandated service, but they are places where we exercise, where schools go, where seniors go," she said.

Supervisor Dave Pine, who was the only member of the Board of Supervisors to vote against putting Measure A on the ballot, said the tax increase has the potential to negatively impact low-income residents.

"We're hurting the people we're trying to serve," he said. "It's much harder for low-income people to absorb."

Measure A requires majority approval to pass.

— Bay City News

What do you think of Measure A?

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch here

 

Follow Pacifica Patch on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Sign up for our daily newsletter Blog for us

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.