.
Feedback

Padreddii Runs For Harbor Commission Reelection

A long-time South City public servant runs once more for harbor commissioner.

Leo Padreddii of South San Francisco has been a San Mateo County Harbor Commissioner for 12 years, and is running for reelection this fall.

After several decades in public service, Padreddii calls it "a way of life."

Recent projects he has been involved in include the new, and what he said is the first dinner cruise boat permit to be granted in the district, which was approved last month.  

This November, six candidates vie for three spots on the Harbor Commission: Padreddii, Will Holsinger, Brandon Kwan, Pietro Parravano, Sabrina Brennan, and Neil Merrilees.

Below is Padreddii's official candidacy statement:

I am currently Vice President and served in each office of the San Mateo County Harbor District. During my incumbancy, the Harbor District has been one of the few Government Districts with a balanced budget as well as surplus funds with no cuts to services.

I have been co-chairman of the task force which has now begun ferry service between San Mateo County (Oyster Point Marina) and Alameda County. The Commission is working together on significant projects at both Oyster Point Marina in SSF and Pillar Point Harbor on the coast. I look forward to continuing this work by following through on these important projects.

As part of my resume in community service, I have 32 years City and State Law Enforcement experience, including FBI training at the CHP Academy. I am a former Mayor of South San Francisco. I also served on the South San Francisco Board for 9 years as well as on the San Mateo county Fair Board for 12 years.

I would be grateful for your vote re-electing me Commissioner to San Mateo County Harbor District.

ENDORSED BY: Jackie Speier, U.S. Congress; Jerry Hill, State Assemblyman

Padreddii told Patch that if he is reelected in November, it will likely be his last run. He said he would be ready for retirement after one more four-year term.

Also this November two South San Francisco Unified School District board members will run for reelection unopposed: Maurice Goodman and Judy Bush.

If City Councilmember Kevin Mullin succeeds in his run for District 22 State Assembly this fall, the council will have the opportunity to either appoint a new member to finish Mullin's term, appoint an interim member, or hold a special election. 

Tell us in the comments section what your thoughts are on the Harbor Commission election or others mentioned here.

Follow us on Twitter here | Like Half Moon Bay Patch here | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for Half Moon Bay Patch

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.