.
Feedback

Paid Parking: Business, Residents and City Council Seek More Information

Cautious approach taken at Tuesday night study session on developing paid parking program downtown.

At a special city council meeting last night called to discuss the proposal of paid parking in the downtown area, Half Moon Bay city councilmembers, downtown merchants and residents all appeared to agree that more research and information was needed before moving forward.

Though a $2/hr parking fee 365 days per year between the hours of 9 a.m. and 7 p.m. as a way to generate an estimated $1 million annually — and recoup estimated installation costs of over $600,000 less than a year later — no councilmembers, merchants or residents spoke out in favor of such a configuration.

Currently, there is no fee charged for downtown parking. Saying that the $2/hr proposal seemed to be too high, several in attendance favored a lower hourly rate — perhaps $1/hr to $1.50/hr. Others were interested in shaving an hour from the period when parking fees would be charged so that actual enforcement would take place between 10 a.m. - 6 p.m., rather than the proposed 9 a.m - 7 p.m.

All advised the council to proceed with caution and asked for more information, questioned the impact of paid parking on local businesses, and asked about revenue sources which could be generated from a paid parking program.

"I'm quite skeptical of the initial idea," downtown business owner Charles Nelson said in regards to a $2/hour parking fee.

Nelson said 40 percent of his customers at — an upscale cooking and appliance store on Main St. — were local. Expressing a desire to make it as easy as possible for customers to shop at his store, he advised the council to act cautiously.

"A lot of businesses on Main St. are in a pretty delicate situation, so we have to proceed carefully here," Nelson said. "We don’t want to do anything to tip the balance."

Downtown business owners Robin Jeffs and Dave Worden told the council they preferred setting up a parking district with revenues which would create a connection in the way the money was generated and the way it was spent.

executive Charise McHugh, who researched parking programs in Truckee and Ventura, said that she preferred a $1/hr option and cited other parking policies, such as a special rate for locals in the city of Ventura.

"This needs to be very well thought out as it's very important to all our businesses and community members and visitors. Most income does come from our visitors," McHugh said. "We have to be very careful and think about how it will affect them."

Councilmember Rick Kowalczyk said he only wanted to charge fees on what the market would bear, and suggested a variable parking program where the cost per parking spot would vary based on demand at the time.

Vice Mayor Allan Alifano said he preferred a $1/hour fee. He cited a paid parking program in Augusta, Ga., where parking proceeds were spent on a sidewalk alley, street lighting and landscaping.

Community members gave input on how such proceeds should be spent at town hall meetings, Alifano said.

Councilmembers and business owners appeared to be in favor of starting paid parking at 10 a.m. in order to provide time for locals to patronize merchants selling coffee and breakfast items.

"It's important to keep in mind that if you reduce certain components, such as hours or days, the program starts to become less feasible," City Manager Laura Snideman said.

McHugh said she felt the cutoff hour for paid parking should be 6 p.m. to accomodate people coming to Half Moon Bay's downtown to eat at Main St. restaurants and checking into hotels, but Kowalcyzk implied later in the meeting that the influx of people at that time was the reason why there should be paid parking charged until 7 p.m.

"I’m more open to the idea — I can see more benefits from it," Nelson said after the meeting. "$1 instead of $2 would be much better. I think it needs to be thought through completely," he said.

City council members agreed on the desire to move forward with the idea of implementing a paid parking program, but felt they needed to do more research before determining fees, the hours of enforcement and the areas of enforcement.

At the council's direction, staff was directed to collect more information about paid parking as it relates to cost, enforcement, and pay station technology.

"We can’t look as it as a tax, we have to look at as investment," Councilmember John Muller said.

"We have to look to the future on how we can maintain such a wonderful community," he continued.

 

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.  

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.