Peninsula Leaders React to High Speed Rail Funding

Following the Legislature’s approval last week of $8 billion in funding; Assemblyman Rich Gordon, Belmont Mayor Dave Warden and Councilmember Coralin Feierbach shared their reactions to the decision.

The California State Assembly and State Senate an initial $8 billion of spending last week for the purposes of constructing the initial leg of the high-speed rail network in the Central Valley.

Proponents of high-speed rail believe it has the potential to revitalize California’s struggling economy while decreasing carbon emissions from cars and airplanes traveling along the popular corridor from the Bay Area to Los Angeles.

Opponents claim high-speed rail is a waste of money and a construction nightmare that will decrease land-values and harm nearby businesses.

The Peninsula itself is strongly divided on the issue. Some such as Assemblyman Rich Gordon are optimistic about high-speed rail’s ability to reignite economic growth.

Gordon referred to the bill as an early investment in California’s rail system that will benefit California’s infrastructure.

Gordon stressed the benefits the Peninsula will receive both in terms of increased Caltrain funding as well as the new proposal to electrify the existing tracks rather than building new tracks to accommodate the new trains.

Nonetheless, Gordon acknowledged it would likely be decades before California sees the envisioned high-speed rail network.

On the other side of the debate, Belmont Mayor Dave Warden has been an active critic of high-speed rail project since the get-go.

Warden said he agrees with Sen. Joe Simitian who voted against the project. "Building tracks in the Central Valley with low ridership, which won't even be high-speed rail is a bad plan," said Warden.

He added that no funding source has been identified for the remaining 80-90 percent of the project.

"Electrification of Caltrain is good, but now that we've taken the carrot, we'll also get the stick!" said Warden.

Belmont Councilmember Coralin Feierbach also does not agree with the Legislature's stance on high-speed rail.

"Simply put, I don't agree with the vote. I did't vote for the high-speed rail bond when it came to the voters and I think there must have been a lot of pressure from the various groups for the Democrats to have voted for it," Feierbach said.

Other leaders such as San Mateo Deputy Mayor David Lim have a cautious but optimistic approach.

Lim stressed that rational dialogue is more effective than the strategy of lawsuits employed by the City of Palo Alto and the Town of Atherton.

By working with the High Speed Rail Authority, Lim believes the City of San Mateo was successful in gaining approval of a ‘Blended System’ whereby the high-speed trains run on existing Caltrain tracks that will be upgraded to serve the new purpose.

“By building within the existing footprint of the Caltrain tracks, we can reduce the property devaluation and noise pollution,” said Lim.

Of the $8 billion spending bill, $500 million will go towards improvements and modernizations for Caltrain, including more funding for suicide prevention initiatives. 

As a result, Lim claims, even if the high-speed rail project goes no further, the peninsula will still be better off as a result of the approved spending.

 “As Americans, we all want this project to succeed, but regardless; this funding will be great for Caltrain and for the Peninsula.”

For now, the high-speed rail still faces challenges within the Central Valley, where it faces lawsuits from Farmers Associations concerned about property damage. Many farmers are currently seeking an injunction that would stall proposed construction.  

Like us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter | Sign up for our daily newsletter | Blog for us|

Greg Snelling July 12, 2012 at 03:47 AM
Polls showed less support from voters of proposed tax increases if funding for HSR was approved. CA leaders playing a game of chicken with taxpayers who vote. I think this guaranteed no new taxes in November.
Ted Crocker July 12, 2012 at 04:48 PM
"[San Mateo Deputy Mayor David] Lim stressed that rational dialogue is more effective than the strategy of lawsuits employed by the City of Palo Alto and the Town of Atherton." Yeah, right, David. Because all the other strategies worked so well, right?! No, we weren't ignored by the HSR Authority. They care so much. Remember Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS)? What a crock! Coming from a lawyer, your statement is laughable. Your City is sucking on the teet of HSR for its development plans and to keep the unions happy. That is the only reason you continue to say this. Thanks for nothing! Signed, Burlingame.
Tom July 12, 2012 at 07:23 PM
Where was everyone when this was on the ballot? It passed, no use in crying over spilled milk, if you didn't want this you should have voted no and convinced others to do the same.
Steve Hayes July 12, 2012 at 07:45 PM
it was more of a concept when we voted for it - something like Eurostar sounded appealing. I expected more of a straight line route (like Paris to London) rather than a route meandering around in the Central Valley.
Bill Bohlen July 12, 2012 at 09:45 PM
Where is the money going to come from?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »