.
Feedback

Supes' Decisions Could Determine Size and Cost Of New Jail

Decisions made during Tuesday's meeting of the County Board of Supervisors could impact a potential new county jail's funding and inmate capacity.

The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors stand on the brink of making a couple of approvals Tuesday that could have a significant impact on the size and cost of a proposed new county jail.

At the meeting Tuesday in Redwood City, supervisors will be asked to approve a request by Sheriff Greg Munks to submit a preliminary application for a state funding grant that would contribute to paying for a portion of the new jail's construction costs.


According to a county report, up to $100 million in grant funding can be requested from the state. The expected total cost to build the new jail is between $100 million and $165 million.

The construction cost is independent from the expected expense of nearly $44 million annually that would be necessary to run the jail, the report indicated.

Supervisor Dave Pine has expressed concerns in the past about approving the jail's construction during a time when the county grapples with an ongoing deficity of roughly $50 million.

The county receiving the grant money could result in reducing jail-related debt by almost 60 percent. But in order to receive the state money, local jurisdictions would be required to match 10 percent of the total awarded amount, according to the county report.

Preliminary applications for the grant are due Oct. 14. Formal applications are due Jan. 4, 2012, and the money will be awarded the following month.

Much of the final costs to build the jail will be contingent on its size, and supervisors are expected to make a decision regarding the scope of the project on Tuesday as well.

Sheriff Munks is recommending supervisors approve proceeding with a plan to build a jail with the capacity to hold between 488 and 552 beds for inmates.

According to a county report, the new jail tower recommended by Sheriff Munks would be built three stories tall, standing at 72 feet high. Between 320 and 384 of the beds would be for male inmates, and 168 would be for female inmates.

And the proposed construction plan would also leave additional space to add more jail cells later in order to accommodate potential future overcrowding.

Another 40-foot building would be necessary to build alongside the jail tower that would house 88 beds as part of an inmate transition program that is dedicated to assisting former inmates with readjusting back into society after serving their time.

Much of the impetus to build the new jail is generated by growing concerns of the Sheriff's Office regarding limited space for inmates.

The county's current jail houses approximately 1,100 inmates, which is nearly 300 more people than the facilities are constructed to accommodate, Sheriff Munks has said.

And, due to state budget concerns, Governor Jerry Brown has approved sending non-violent prisoners currently jailed in state facilities back to local county jurisdictions.

Under the state-approved realignment, about 400 inmates currently held in state facilities for convictions of non-violent crimes will land back in San Mateo County for the rest of their sentence.

The relocation of inmates was scheduled to begin taking place on Oct. 1.

Last year, the county purchased 4.8 acres of land east of Highway 101 in Redwood City as a site to build the proposed new jail.

The Board of Supervisors will meet Tuesday at 9 a.m. in the County Center in Redwood City to address these issues, and more.

 

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?