.
Feedback

Two Former County Employees Arrested for Stealing from Deceased Residents' Estates

A San Mateo woman and Daly City man reportedly stole thousands in cash as well as documents and valuables from at least 20 estates.

Agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) arrested two defendants Friday morning for stealing from the estates of deceased people they administered as public employees, announced United States Attorney Melinda Haag and Stephanie Douglas, special agent in charge of the FBI office in San Francisco. 

The charges were contained in an indictment returned by a federal grand jury Thursday and unsealed Friday after the arrest of Mandy Natchi Yagi, 54, of San Mateo, and Peter Wong, 43, of Daly City.            

San Mateo County District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe told Patch the indictment charges Yagi and Wong with three felonies. A press release from the FBI states those felony charges include conspiracy to commit theft from a federally funded program and theft concerning a federally funded program.             

The San Mateo County government includes a Public Administrator who is responsible for investigating and administering the estates of County residents who die without a will or an appropriate person willing and able to act as the estate administrator.

Yagi and Wong were employed as deputy public administrators through the San Mateo District Attorney's Office until late 2011.  Deputy public administrators are County employees who administer the estates under the Public Administrator's jurisdiction. 

A deputy public administrator's duties include protecting the decedent's property from waste, loss, or theft; making appropriate burial arrangements; conducting investigations to discover the decedent's assets; liquidating assets at public sale or distributing them to heirs; paying the decedent's bills and taxes; locating people entitled to inherit from the estate and ensuring that these people received their inheritance.

As the Public Administrator is part of the San Mateo County District Attorney's Office, District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe told Patch that the case was turned over to the U.S. Attorney's Office and San Mateo County Public Health Department for investigation, in order for the DA's office to stay neutral in the matter.

"I had to recuse myself. We can't investigate something that was part of the DA's Public Administrator Office," Wagstaffe said, since the defendants were technically employees of his office at some point when the thefts are believed to have occured.

Wagstaffe said the investigation was a long one, as county officials slowly started to notice signs that something was not right with the deceased county residents' estates.

"The department started noticing discrepancies in the estates and accounts that caused them to think there might have been thefts," he explained.           

According to a press release by the FBI, in their official capacities as deputy public administrators, Yagi and Wong had access to the assets - including cash, financial instruments, bank accounts, and valuable items such as jewelry - of the estates they administered. The indictment charges Yagi and Wong with using this access to take possession of estate assets for their personal benefit and for the benefit of persons other than the rightful owner.

According to the indictment, which the FBI sent to Patch, thefts between November of 2010 and July of 2011 included a little more than $10,000 in cash and as many as 14 pieces of jewelry of jewelry and gold. Additionally, the article states that, between February and October of 2011, the defendants allegedly stored a metal box in a storage facility that contained documents and valuables belonging to as many as 19 different estates they were in charge of.

The defendants made their initial appearances in federal court Friday morning before United States Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins, and were ordered released subject to the posting of $100,000 unsecured bonds. Their next scheduled appearance before Judge Cousins will be on June 27 for identification of counsel, according to the FBI's press release.

According to the FBI, the maximum statutory penalty for conspiracy to commit theft from a federally funded program is five years.  The maximum penalty for theft concerning a federally funded program is ten years.  

Drew Caputo is the assistant United States attorney who is prosecuting the case with the assistance of Rosario Calderon and Courtney Tellian.  The prosecution is the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, building on an initial investigation by the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office.  The San Mateo County Sheriff's Office has continued to assist the FBI in the investigation that resulted in this prosecution.             

Patch will continue to update this story as more information becomes available.

 

Follow San Mateo Patch on Twitter | Like San Mateo Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the San Mateo Patch daily newsletter | Blog for San Mateo Patch

Follow Foster City Patch on Twitter | Like Foster City Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the Foster City Patch daily newsletter | Blog for Foster City Patch


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Coco May 25, 2013 at 07:03 pm
How biased does one have to be to even hint that Taco Bell will compete with the authentic mexicanRead More food available here in HMB? Anyone eating at Taco Bell surely knows the type of food they are getting, and it is not Mexican! Sad as it is, people still can choose to eat "frankenfood" or "crap in a bag" any time they wish. It will not take any business from the places serving real food. I am wondering if will take as long as the Philly Cheesesteak place did to actually be allowed to open?
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?