.
Feedback

Voters Consider Ending 'At Large' Supervisor Elections

A measure on this November's ballot lets voters choose how they want to elect their county supervisors.

A countywide measure that would change the way San Mateo County elects its Board of Supervisors will be decided in November.

Measure B proposes amending the county charter to change the mode of electing individual supervisors from countywide "at-large" elections to five separate "by-district" elections.

San Mateo County is currently the only county in California to use at-large elections, a practice that has prompted criticism and even a lawsuit from groups that contend that the system leads to costly campaigns that prevent minority communities from being fairly represented on the board.

The lawsuit, filed in 2011 by the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights, has been suspended until after the Nov. 6 election.

Supervisor Dave Pine and a broad coalition of Peninsula mayors, city council members and school board trustees gathered in front of Millbrae City Hall last week to voice their support for Measure B.

Pine, who said he has been an advocate for switching to district elections even before he was elected in 2011, said the change would increase fair representation on the Board of Supervisors by broadening the pool of candidates and making elections more competitive.

"In a district type of an election, you could run a grassroots campaign without a lot of money," Pine said. "It will increase the odds that the board would be more representative of a diverse community."

Pine said that in the last 30 years, an incumbent supervisor has never lost a re-election campaign.

Opponents of the measure -- who include three incumbent supervisors and U.S. Reps. Jackie Speier, D-San Mateo, and Anna Eshoo, D-Palo Alto -- argue that countywide elections inspire candidates to be accountable to all county residents, not just to those who live in one of five districts.

"With supervisors elected countywide, no one region of the county gets special treatment, because supervisors must consider the whole county when they make decisions," Speier said in a statement against Measure B.

Pine disagreed, saying that the majority of issues that come before the board -- providing access to health care, public safety, and environmental protection -- are issues that affect the entire county anyway, and that supervisors elected by district will better represent the changing demographics of the county while continuing to act in the best interest of all residents.

"I haven't seen all that many issues where my vote would be influenced by where I live," Pine said.

Supervisor Don Horsley, who has not taken an official position for or against Measure B, said he supports leaving the choice to voters.

"My reasoning is, let the people decide how they want to be governed," Horsley said. "I trust democracy."

Proposals to switch to district elections have gone before San Mateo County voters twice before, in 1978 and 1980, and on both occasions they failed.

Measure B requires a simple majority to pass.

Candidates Shelly Masur and Warren Slocum are running for the District 4 seat in this November's election.

--Bay City News

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.