.
Feedback

Cabrillo Unified Superintendent to Retire

Superintendent Robert Gaskill will retire from the Cabrillo Unified School District at the end of the school year.

Superintendent Robert Gaskill will be retiring from the in July after a unanimous vote Thursday from the CUSD Governing Board.

After 40 years of service in education, Gaskill discussed his letter of intention to retire to the board with bittersweet conversation.

“If I have any regret, nearly all of my four and a half years here has been to keep the ship afloat,” Gaskill said. “It’s much more fun to sail the ship.”

Gaskill said he realized that he is not leaving the district in the most stable of times, but compared to two years prior they are in a much more sound position.

“It’s been an honor to work with you all,” he said.

The board agreed that Gaskill had become superintendent at a time when severe financial difficulties hit the district.

“You were the right type of superintendent we needed at the right time,” said board member John Moseley. “You’ve been a real steady rock.”

Board President Kirk Riemer said that of the superintendents he has worked with or encountered, Gaskill was the most successful and most openly communicative in times of uncertainty.

“You’ve gotten us through some incredible financial times,” Riemer said. “I almost apologize we couldn’t be in better financial times during your reign.”

Gaskill said he is excited to start a new phase in his life.

“Every step I have been through has been an adventure,” he said.

The board continued to discuss strategies to easing the district’s structural budget deficit.

With an $800,000 ongoing structural deficit, the board has considered various strategies including increasing K-3 class sizes, eliminating counselor positions and cutting funds for athletic programs.

Additionally, as Governor Jerry Brown’s , CUSD will lose $300,000-$400,00, according to Gaskill.

The board has several opinions, sometimes contrasting, regarding how to create revenue and determine budget savings.

Riemer said that a parcel tax is an equitable strategy while Moseley questioned the configuration of the district.

“I know there’s efficiencies we’re not exercising,” Moseley said. “I’m a little slow to come to the public for more when we haven’t done our homework.”

But Gaskill advised the board that the state of the governor’s proposal would not really be known until June.

“Keep your options open as long as you can in an unknown situation,” he said.

The superintendent was specifically referring to the March deadline to notify school employees that they may be receiving pink slips that year. If the deadline passes without any action, there is no longer the option of district layoffs, Gaskill said.

In his first years of teaching, Gaskill said he received a pink slip notice.

“It’s a gut-wrenching thing,” he said. “But keep your options open.”

If pink slips do come into the equation, Gaskill said, the public might ignite an innovative interest in the district's financial pinch.

Principal Mary Streshly said HMBHS is one of the CUSD schools looking at their specific sites to find budget savings.

But when discussions include teachers, Streshly said, the dialogue in the school often becomes stagnant.

“My site is very, very sensitive,” she said. “They literally have to point to each other.”

The board will continue their conversation of strategies for addressing the structural budget deficit with much more intricate detail in the report, Gaskill said.

“You are the protectors of the district budget,” he said.

The next CUSD Governing Board meeting is scheduled for February 9 at 7 p.m. in the District Office.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.
Chris Vance March 23, 2013 at 03:00 pm
What are you doing with the excess Undaria pinnatifida that is found? Can we get some of it for ourRead More compost piles at the Pacifica Sanchez Library Garden?