.

County Voters to Decide on Host of Tax Measures

Hike in hotel guest taxes in unincorporated areas on June 5 ballot, along with school parcel tax measures in Half Moon Bay, Daly City and Redwood City.

 

San Mateo County voters will consider several business-related taxes and a handful of school parcel tax and bond measures in the June 5 primary — including Measure S, an voters will be deciding on in Half Moon Bay.

Among the most contentious measures on the ballot are a proposed transient occupancy tax increase and business license taxes for commercial parking and car rental businesses in unincorporated areas of the county.

Proponents of all three measures include Board of Supervisors President Adrienne Tissier, Supervisor Carole Groom and San Mateo County Schools Superintendent Ann Campbell.

Opponents include the citizens' group Taxpayers for a Strong Economy and the general managers of the Best Western Grosvenor and San Francisco Airport Marriott hotels.

Measure U would raise the transient occupancy tax paid by guests at hotels in unincorporated areas from 10 percent to 12 percent. Supporters say Measure U would bring the transient occupancy tax in line with that of neighboring cities and counties. Opponents argue that the transient occupancy tax increase would hurt the hotel industry and discourage tourism.

Measure X proposes an 8 percent business license tax on all commercial parking facilities in unincorporated areas. The measure could raise approximately $5 million annually for the county's general fund, according to the measure's supporters. Opponents claim the new tax would add to the high cost of living on the Peninsula because the cost would be passed on to consumers. Measure T would levy a 2.5 percent business license tax on all car rental businesses in unincorporated areas. Proponents say car rental businesses pay less than 1 percent tax to the county, and that more than doubling the tax could raise nearly $8 million annually. Opponents say that any new taxes in a sluggish economy are a bad idea.

All three business tax measures require a simple majority to pass.

The June 5 ballot also includes three measures that would benefit local school districts. Measure S would authorize the issuance of $81 million in 40-year bonds for the , which includes four elementary schools, , an , and . The funds would help pay for school facility upgrades and maintenance. The bond measure requires 55 percent approval to pass.

Measure Y would levy a $45 annual tax on parcels within the Jefferson Union High School District for four years. The money would be used to enhance classroom programs and computer instruction, and attract and retain teachers.

In the Redwood City Elementary School District, Measure W aims to raise revenue for reading, writing and math programs, school libraries and other uses. The measure proposes a $67 parcel tax that would be in effect for five years. Measures Y and W both require two-thirds voter approval to pass.

Two special district taxes are on the ballot for voters in Portola Valley and the unincorporated San Mateo neighborhood of Highlands. Measure V would raise an annual parcel tax on properties in Portola Valley's Wayside II Road Maintenance District from $625 to $950. The funds would be used to cover the increasing costs of road maintenance and repair within the district.

Measure Z would extend a $65 annual parcel tax for police and fire services in the Highlands neighborhood. The tax has been in effect since 1982 and requires reauthorization by voters every four years.

Both Measures Z and V require a two-thirds majority to pass.

— Bay City News

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

George Muteff May 15, 2012 at 03:50 AM
What does it say about government when so many agencies are in the same position? I am not familiar with most of the measures on area ballots, but I think I've got a better than fair handle on Measure S. That measure, as described above, is on this June's ballot after a unanimous vote by the CUSD. There are NO exemptions, should it pass. As long as we're talking NO, there is NO supporting documentation supporting Measure S from the district. What we get again and instead is the heartstring pull of "fix leaky roofs" and dreams: "$10 Million for current and future technology needs", a "new pool for $5 Million, and one of my favorites, a "new performing arts building" for $15 Million. The CUSD annual budget is approximately $25 Million. Not one stitch of supporting documentation! Try getting a used skateboard financed without supporting documentation.
George Muteff May 15, 2012 at 04:44 AM
For those interested, I posted a thread on TalkAbout on May 11th on Measure S. Here it is: http://talkaboutwidget.hmbreview.com/topic.php?t=7836&c=4&d=m
Cid May 15, 2012 at 02:25 PM
This makes me ill..... I wish they would just Man-up and tells us at meetings that the bond will be for 40 years. Mike Alifano, slippery fish, slithered out of that one at our Candidates forum!
George Muteff May 15, 2012 at 03:57 PM
Cid, in all fairness, Mike Alifano is not a Cabrillo Unified School District Board (CUSD) member. He is, in this regard, no different than you and me. He's got a couple of kids and wants the best for them. I understand that, even though he and I disagree on this measure. It is the CUSD Board and senior admin that I have issue with on this - multiple issues. If it's a target you're looking to paint, paint it on the CUSD Board and senior admin (superintendent). That's where it belongs, if you were to ask me. It's called full disclosure; something that seems very rare around these parts.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »