.
Feedback

Pacifica Beaches Resembled 'War Zone' on Night of Fourth, Cleanup Volunteer Says

Montara woman collected 35 gallons of toxic fireworks remnants on the night of the Fourth. She's urging Pacifica residents to demand the city ban the sale of legal fireworks.

On a night when America celebrated its independence, the picturesque Pacifica beaches that are a destination for thousands of Bay Area residents each year more closely closely resembled a Third World toxic dump, according to a Montara woman who along with a friend, spent the night of the Fourth combing the beaches for fireworks debris.

Sue Pemberton and fellow coastal resident Myrna Faulds removed enough fireworks remnants to fill buckets totaling 35 gallons that she believes would have been swept to sea by an incoming tide.

Environmentalists say fireworks debris contain toxic pollutants that can kill marine wildlife if ingested.

Pemberton called the experience an "eye-opener," and is urging fellow coastal residents to demand Pacifica ban the sale of legal fireworks.

Pacifica is among a handful of Bay Area cities and two in San Mateo County allowing the sale of so-called "safe and sane" fireworks. San Bruno is the other.

Pemberton said getting as many of the fireworks remnants off the beaches as possible before a six-foot tide rolled in was critical to protecting the coastal waters.

Local groups that profit from the sale of legal fireworks are required to clean up the beaches of Pacifica the day after Fourth of July celebrations, but Pemberton said such measures are woefully inadequate considering the massive amounts of toxic debris that littered beaches on the night of the Fourth.

"The beach looks like a war zone," Pemberton said in an email to the Pacifica Beach Coalition, a local environmental group that so far has taken a neutral stance on the city's policy allowing the sale of so-called "safe and sane" fireworks. 

Pemberton said she and Faulds saw some setting off fireworks properly and discarding the remnants in buckets, but said they were in the minority. 

The on the night of the Fourth and on Saturday.

Got Patch? Sign up for our newsletter by clicking on the "Patch Newsletter" link on the top right of our homepage.

To receive news feeds about Half Moon Bay and the unincorporated Coastside between Montara and Pescadero, visit Half Moon Bay Patch on Facebook and "like" us here. Follow us on Twitter here.

Want to blog for us? Click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Half Moon Bay Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jon DeLong May 18, 2013 at 06:45 pm
With so many good Mexican restaurants in the area, why bother?
Cid May 17, 2013 at 06:14 pm
I enjoy an occasional Taco Bell, but in the same shopping center as Happy Taco with far better,Read More authentic LOCAL Mexican food! Nah! I do enjoy the Combo locations that have KFC & TACO BELL. (Face it, Americans like to have choices!). With no drive-through, perhaps it will be better than the average suburban stores along the El Camino. As for another chain restaurant in Half Moon Bay...What did you expect? Demographics will continue to dictate that we can still expect to keep our "Fast-Food-Free-Zone" between Linda Mar and HMB while "City Councils or Planning Departments in the Cities will attract them....for their tax base.
Dee May 15, 2013 at 08:07 pm
Seriously? Taco Bell? Next to New Leaf? How did this happen? Not happy about this addition and notRead More looking forward to seeing Taco Bell trash all over the place. Not sure about KFC ... we already have a fast food chicken place at Popeyes so we certainly don't need another. The high school students will probably frequent Taco Bell the most and keep it in business but I will not be going there that's for sure.
Carol Wexler May 18, 2013 at 02:42 pm
I would consider volunteering at the California State Parks but dogs are not allowed and I wouldRead More need to bring my dog.
pae May 18, 2013 at 11:22 pm
Misha, I understand where you're coming from, but that's what we don't want to do. One reason thatRead More all dog owners are being discriminated against is those few who don't follow the rules. It doesn't matter that there are bicyclists and horseback riders who don't follow rules, they're "OK," it's the dog owners who pay the price. We want an area where our dogs can exercise freely and legally, where we won't be bothered by people who are afraid of dogs or dislike them, and where they're not at risk from horses who spook. For those of us who live surrounded by Rancho land especially, we don't want to have to drive miles to a small, fenced lot with crowds of others seeking to exercise their dogs in the same small area. We're paying for this open space with our tax dollars, and we want to have access to it. There's plenty of room for everyone.
Misha Flores May 17, 2013 at 09:35 am
To be honest I would probably just let my dog run around without a leash anyway, except there's soRead More much darned poison oak around these hills. I don't want her to get contaminated and then I hug her and trouble ensues.
Anne Martin May 16, 2013 at 04:29 pm
I don't own a dog now but empathize with the dog owners who have been deprived of the right toRead More allow their dogs to run free in the national recreation area that we as taxpayers own. As a taxpayer, I want to know the rationale for this policy. If it is to protect horses from being frightened by dogs what is the basis for that? How many horses use the open space? It appears that dozens of people who have been able to enjoy walking with their dogs in the open space adjoining their neighborhood are now being grossly inconvenienced because some faceless bureaucrats are creating rules that may have no basis in reality.